From: Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>
Date: 2003-12-11T05:10:06+09:00
Subject: Re: Finding Software, prenatal projects at RubyForge (Was: format money)

Tom Copeland wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 12:15, Hal Fulton wrote:
> 
>>Well, maybe they could be marked inactive in some way. When they
>>appeared in a list, they could be flagged with a little icon, and
>>when the page is visited, it could have a big red warning at the
>>top.
> 
> 
> Hm, that's an good idea.  Might be a tricky bit trying to figure out
> what makes a project inactive, though... lack of CVS commits?  Lack of
> page views or downloads?  Dunno.  

Personally I'd be conservative with it -- mark it inactive if it
is registered and then has no content whatsoever after N months.

Whether people view it or download it is not a factor IMO.

Hal