From: "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Date: 2003-12-08T15:02:44+09:00
Subject: Re: subclassing Errno::XXX

Hello,

In message "subclassing Errno::XXX"
    on Dec.08,2003 14:47:38, <vjoel@PATH.Berkeley.EDU> wrote:
| I've decided to no longer subclass in this way, for other reasons, but 
| I'm still curious. Is it a scope thing? Or just something about Errno?

 p Errno::ENOENT::Errno # => 2

Errno::XXXX and their subclasses must have constant named Errno.


Regards,
-- 
U.Nakamura <usa@osb.att.ne.jp>