From: "T. Onoma" <transami@...>
Date: 2003-12-04T03:09:52+09:00
Subject: Re: mixin vs. multiple inheritence

On Wednesday 03 December 2003 06:53 pm, Dave Thomas wrote:
> Anyway, to be honest the whole conversation is somewhat moot: it isn't
> really an issue of whether one solves another's problems. Both work,
> they do similar but not identical things, and each has a set of rules
> you have to understand to use them.

What you say is true enough. But I am wondering what it is that supposedly 
Mutiple-in gives you that Mix-in does not, which was implied by matz, albiet 
that the it is better Ruby's way.

T.