From: Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Date: 2003-12-02T06:29:44+09:00
Subject: Re: rdoc included in standard distribution?

On Tuesday, December 2, 2003, 1:48:44 AM, Dave wrote:

> Gavin:

> The actual sequence of calls is

>     require 'rdoc/rdoc'

>     rdoc = RDoc::RDoc.new
>     rdoc.document(args)

Do you see any sense in allowing this?

  rdoc = RDoc::RDoc.new do |r|
    r.template = 'css2'
    r.title = 'FooBar API'
    r.main = "README"
    r.output_dir = "/tmp/html"
    ...
  end

Perhaps in combination with the argument-passing ability.  This means
of initialising data-heavy objects is great, I find.  Better than
keyword arguments, because you can look up the attributes in the RDoc
output.

> And you can now do this in the CVS version of Ruby.

Cool.  What does this mean for rdoc.sourceforge.net?

Gavin