From: "T. Onoma" <transami@...>
Date: 2003-11-30T22:29:21+09:00
Subject: Re: anything disappearing from Ruby for 2.0?

On Sunday 30 November 2003 02:18 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: anything disappearing from Ruby for 2.0?"
>
>     on 03/11/30, "T. Onoma" <transami@runbox.com> writes:
> |> It will not be changed.  Ruby will remain being Ruby even after Ruby2.
> |> Perhaps some next generation language would have constructs for each
> |> role.
> |
> |You pegged me wrong Matz! It is not that I want them to, per se.  I was
> | just pointing it out.
>
> I meant "if someone (not only you, Tom) want to change, wait for (or
> create your own) next generation language."

Okay, just wanted to be clear on where I stood on that.

Thanks,
-t0