[#84664] CGI uses file size to distinguish between regular values and files — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...>

I've been having a ton of problems handling file uploads with CGI.rb

23 messages 2003/11/02
[#84674] Re: CGI uses file size to distinguish between regular values and files — Simon Kitching <simon@...> 2003/11/03

Hi David,

[#84676] Re: CGI uses file size to distinguish between regular values and files — Dmitry Borodaenko <d.borodaenko@...> 2003/11/03

On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 02:29:08PM +0900, Simon Kitching wrote:

[#84678] Re: CGI uses file size to distinguish between regular values and files — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/11/03

On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 20:12:06 +0900, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:

[#84692] Re: CGI uses file size to distinguish between regular values and files — Dmitry Borodaenko <d.borodaenko@...> 2003/11/03

On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:40:48PM +0900, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#84700] Re: CGI uses file size to distinguish between regular values and files — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/11/03

On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 04:37:19 +0900, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:

[#84701] Re: CGI uses file size to distinguish between regular values and files — Simon Kitching <simon@...> 2003/11/03

On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 10:29, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#84703] Re: CGI uses file size to distinguish between regular values and files — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/11/03

On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 06:51:43 +0900, Simon Kitching wrote:

[#84708] Re: CGI uses file size to distinguish between regular values and files — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/04

Hi,

[#84735] Managing metadata about attribute types — Simon Kitching <simon@...>

Hi,

52 messages 2003/11/05
[#84740] Re: Managing metadata about attribute types — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/11/05

On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 09:38:16 +0900, Simon Kitching wrote:

[#84741] Re: Managing metadata about attribute types — Simon Kitching <simon@...> 2003/11/05

On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 17:09, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#84762] Re: Managing metadata about attribute types — Simon Kitching <simon@...> 2003/11/06

What a vigorous discussion I seem to have triggered :-)

[#84770] Re: Managing metadata about attribute types — dblack@... 2003/11/06

Hi --

[#84780] Re: Managing metadata about attribute types — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...> 2003/11/06

On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 12:45:39 +0900

[#84858] Re: Managing metadata about attribute types — "John W. Long" <ng@...> 2003/11/08

Ryan,

[#84847] Long-running daemon acquiring giant memory footprint — Jason DiCioccio <jd@...>

I have written a long-running daemon in ruby to handle dynamic DNS updates.

16 messages 2003/11/07

[#84900] Antwort: Re: Power of Interpreted Languages — Robert.Koepferl@...

25 messages 2003/11/10
[#84914] Re: Antwort: Re: Power of Interpreted Languages — Aredridel <aredridel@...> 2003/11/10

> But, would you implement a game with ruby?

[#84917] Re: Antwort: Re: Power of Interpreted Languages — Gregory Millam <walker@...> 2003/11/10

Received: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 01:21:15 +0900

[#84920] Re: Antwort: Re: Power of Interpreted Languages — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/10

On Monday 10 November 2003 09:28 am, Gregory Millam wrote:

[#84921] Ruby/Tk Some Basic Questions — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2003/11/10

Hi,

[#84930] Re: Ruby/Tk Some Basic Questions — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2003/11/11

Hi,

[#85097] substring: to the end of the string — KONTRA Gergely <kgergely@...>

Hi!

19 messages 2003/11/14

[#85104] Microsoft's C/C++ compiler freely available — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...>

Thought this might be interesting to those stuck on win32...

23 messages 2003/11/15
[#85106] Re: Microsoft's C/C++ compiler freely available — Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...> 2003/11/15

Question:

[#85178] overload method in module_eval, how? — Simon Strandgaard <qj5nd7l02@...>

I want to overload a testcase method with debug-enabling wrapper.

13 messages 2003/11/17

[#85218] Access ftp-server through proxy — Kristian Sensen <ks@...>

14 messages 2003/11/17

[#85330] Yet Another Rite Thought: method combination — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com>

I just looked at matz' slides and I don't have a clear understanding

28 messages 2003/11/17

[#85421] Again, Rite explanation needed (keyword args and new hash syntax) — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com>

Hi gurus and nubys,

13 messages 2003/11/18

[#85488] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) )<Pine.LNX.4.44.0311171402340.1133-100000@ool-435 5dfae.dyn.optonline.net> — "Weirich, James" <James.Weirich@...>

David Black (dblack@wobblini.net) wrote:

121 messages 2003/11/18
[#85492] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) )<Pine.LNX.4.44.0311171402340.1133-100000@ool-435 5dfae.dyn.optonline.net> — Simon Kitching <simon@...> 2003/11/18

On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 10:30, Weirich, James wrote:

[#85499] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) )<Pine.LNX.4.44.0311171402340.1133-100000@ool-435 5dfae.dyn.optonline.net> — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/18

On Tuesday 18 November 2003 02:06 pm, Simon Kitching wrote:

[#85523] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/11/19

On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 08:08:25 +0900, Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#85582] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/19

On Tuesday 18 November 2003 10:30 pm, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#85609] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/11/19

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 02:43:31 +0900, Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#85619] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/19

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 12:04 pm, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#85656] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/11/19

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 05:48:37 +0900, Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#85664] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/19

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 03:00 pm, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#85684] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/11/20

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 08:19:08 +0900, Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#85688] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — Simon Kitching <simon@...> 2003/11/20

On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 14:06, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#85734] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — Thien Vuong <tvuong@...> 2003/11/20

[#85748] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/11/20

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:52:17 +0900, Thien Vuong wrote:

[#85854] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/20

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 10:47 pm, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#85858] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — dblack@... 2003/11/20

Hi --

[#85895] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/20

Hi,

[#85906] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2003/11/20

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#85908] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/20

On Thursday 20 November 2003 02:40 pm, Chad Fowler wrote:

[#85938] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/21

Hi,

[#85940] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/21

On Thursday 20 November 2003 06:47 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#85944] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/21

Hi,

[#85951] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/21

On Thursday 20 November 2003 07:58 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#85970] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/21

Hi,

[#85997] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/21

On Friday 21 November 2003 02:20 am, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#86046] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/21

Hi,

[#86071] Method wrapper question (was "stereotyping (was ...)) — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/11/22

On Saturday, November 22, 2003, 10:53:39 AM, Yukihiro wrote:

[#86085] Re: Method wrapper question (was "stereotyping (was ...)) — ts <decoux@...> 2003/11/22

>>>>> "G" == Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@soyabean.com.au> writes:

[#86090] Re: Method wrapper question (was "stereotyping (was ...)) — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/11/22

On Saturday, November 22, 2003, 11:47:50 PM, ts wrote:

[#86091] Re: Method wrapper question (was "stereotyping (was ...)) — ts <decoux@...> 2003/11/22

>>>>> "G" == Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@soyabean.com.au> writes:

[#86092] Re: Method wrapper question (was "stereotyping (was ...)) — "Christoph" <chr_mail@...> 2003/11/22

ts wrote:

[#86093] Re: Method wrapper question (was "stereotyping (was ...)) — ts <decoux@...> 2003/11/22

>>>>> "C" == Christoph <chr_mail@gmx.net> writes:

[#86095] Re: Method wrapper question (was "stereotyping (was ...)) — "Christoph" <chr_mail@...> 2003/11/22

ts wrote:

[#85590] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2003/11/19

Hi --

[#85597] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/19

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 10:33 am, David A. Black wrote:

[#85599] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/19

Hi,

[#85604] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/19

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 11:14 am, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#85503] String startswith/endswith in Ruby? — Dave Benjamin <ramen@...>

Hi all,

12 messages 2003/11/18

[#85518] Multi-dimensioned sparse array ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...>

Does anyone have an implementation of a multi-dimensioned sparse array?

14 messages 2003/11/19
[#85527] Re: Multi-dimensioned sparse array ? — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/11/19

On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:21:19 +0900, Charles Hixson wrote:

[#85526] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) )<Pine.LNX.4.44.0311171402340.1133-100000@ool-4355dfae.dyn.optonline.net> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311181524130.2236-100000@ool-4355dfae.dyn.optonline.net> — Thien Vuong <tvuong@...>

54 messages 2003/11/19
[#85544] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) — dblack@... 2003/11/19

[Apologies to anyone whose threading is getting messed up by the

[#85583] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/19

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 03:55 am, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:

[#85588] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2003/11/19

Hi --

[#85595] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/19

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 10:27 am, David A. Black wrote:

[#85598] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/19

Hi,

[#85601] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/19

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 11:05 am, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#85605] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2003/11/19

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#85612] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/19

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 11:46 am, Chad Fowler wrote:

[#85617] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) — Maik Schmidt <contact@...> 2003/11/19

Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#85629] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/19

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 12:42 pm, Maik Schmidt wrote:

[#85543] Re: $& write-protected? — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "S" == Simon Strandgaard <none> writes:

14 messages 2003/11/19

[#85547] x.f! RCR — Greg McIntyre <greg@...>

It bugs me that some methods have a ! on the end and some don't. It

20 messages 2003/11/19

[#85698] Re: "stereotyping" — Michael Campbell <michael_s_campbell@...>

Sean O'Dell wrote:

19 messages 2003/11/20
[#85701] Re: "stereotyping" — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/20

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 07:01 pm, Michael Campbell wrote:

[#85704] Re: "stereotyping" — Michael campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2003/11/20

Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#85718] Re: "stereotyping" — Clifford Heath <cjh_nospam@...> 2003/11/20

Michael campbell wrote:

[#85757] Re: "stereotyping" — Julian Fitzell <julian@...4.com> 2003/11/20

Clifford Heath wrote:

[#85913] Re: "stereotyping" — Clifford Heath <cjh_nospam@...> 2003/11/20

Julian Fitzell wrote:

[#85713] Re: [ANN] win32-clipboard 0.1.0 — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Oops - forgot the link:

14 messages 2003/11/20

[#85766] learning the "Ruby way" — mark.wirdnam@... (Mark Wirdnam)

**Hobby-programmer alarm**

24 messages 2003/11/20
[#85863] Re: learning the "Ruby way" — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2003/11/20

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Mark Wirdnam wrote:

[#85821] iterator 0.1 — Simon Strandgaard <qj5nd7l02@...>

homepage:

22 messages 2003/11/20

[#85870] Re: "stereotyping" — Michael Campbell <michael_s_campbell@...>

Sean O'Dell wrote:

17 messages 2003/11/20

[#85886] Partial Euphoric Type Checking — "T. Onoma" <transami@...>

Greetings all Type Checkers!

16 messages 2003/11/20
[#85948] Re: Partial Euphoric Type Checking (now Ducked!) — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/21

quack! quack! I added duck typing capability to my euphoric type checking

[#85952] Re: Partial Euphoric Type Checking (Super Duck!?) — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/21

Now some for some rally crazy cross thought. First a complete interface

[#85957] Re: Partial Euphoric Type Checking (Super Duck!?) — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/21

for some cross rally some thought crazy. ( read: i need a type system for my

[#85981] Re: Partial Euphoric Type Checking (Super Duck!?) — Chris Morris <chrismo@...> 2003/11/21

> you see we have a problem here. it doesn't matter what methods are

[#85987] Re: Partial Euphoric Type Checking (Super Duck!?) — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/11/21

> > you see we have a problem here. it doesn't matter what methods are

[#85888] New Type Checking System Idea — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...>

Taking comments into consideration, a totally new approach strikes me

22 messages 2003/11/20

[#85947] RubyConf 2003 Presentations Posted — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

In absolute record time (5 days compared to 3 months), rubyconf 2003

11 messages 2003/11/21

[#86007] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Weirich, James" <James.Weirich@...>

> This is a wonderful idea. Let me restate it to make sure I

13 messages 2003/11/21

[#86127] Ruby classes for MP3 de-/encoding — Dennis Oelkers <dennis@...>

Hello folks,

12 messages 2003/11/22

[#86183] "wrong argument type nil (expected String)" from Dir.chdir — Tim Kynerd <vxbrw58s02@...>

I'm running Ruby 1.6.8.

13 messages 2003/11/23

[#86202] Message "Insecure world writable dir ..." — Harry Ohlsen <harryo@...>

When File.popen() is passed an executable whose path contains a world writable directory, it produces a warning message.

19 messages 2003/11/24

[#86215] Library path relative to current .rb file — zoranlazarevic@... (Zoran Lazarevic)

One of the most irritating (missing) features of Ruby is inability to

12 messages 2003/11/24

[#86265] raise unless RUBY_VERSION[%r/^\s*\d+\.\d+/o].to_f >= 1.8 — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...>

25 messages 2003/11/24

[#86344] Re: Controlled block variables — "T. Onoma" <transami@...>

On Wednesday 26 November 2003 09:10 am, Guy Decoux wrote:

42 messages 2003/11/26
[#86346] Re: Controlled block variables — ts <decoux@...> 2003/11/26

>>>>> "T" == T Onoma <transami@runbox.com> writes:

[#86347] Re: Controlled block variables — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/26

On Wednesday 26 November 2003 09:56 am, ts wrote:

[#86369] Re: Controlled block variables — Dan Doel <djd15@...> 2003/11/26

I actually have wondered in the past why there isn't an #eval that takes

[#86390] Re: Controlled block variables — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/26

On Wednesday 26 November 2003 03:57 pm, Dan Doel wrote:

[#86360] turning a string into array of ASCII bytes — David Garamond <lists@...6.isreserved.com>

What is the shortest, most straightforward way (without temporary

17 messages 2003/11/26

[#86391] Method wrapping — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>

I've come late into the thread on this, and I haven't read all

62 messages 2003/11/26
[#86445] Re: Method wrapping — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/26

Hi,

[#86457] Re: Method wrapping — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2003/11/27

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#86462] Re: Method wrapping — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/27

Hi,

[#86470] Re: Method wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/27

On Thursday 27 November 2003 07:07 am, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#86493] Re: Method wrapping — "Christoph" <chr_mail@...> 2003/11/27

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#86498] Re: Method wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/11/27

> I have asked the same this question as well and I really wish

[#86508] Re: Method wrapping — "Christoph" <chr_mail@...> 2003/11/27

From: Peter wrote:

[#86512] Re: Method wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/11/27

> This sound all good and well however this does not change the

[#86550] pre/post question/idea — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hello --

21 messages 2003/11/28

[#86646] Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...>

Its important that we clearly seperate the issue of "surface" syntax from the

54 messages 2003/11/28
[#86657] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/11/28

> Thoughts?

[#86692] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/29

On Saturday 29 November 2003 12:44 am, Peter wrote:

[#86707] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/11/29

> I originally had a small paragraph touching on this, but I took it out b/c I

[#86726] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/29

On Saturday 29 November 2003 04:26 pm, Peter wrote:

[#86734] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/11/30

> The join-points are the only thing required to facilitate all of this. So I

[#86747] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/30

On Sunday 30 November 2003 01:01 am, Peter wrote:

[#86794] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/11/30

> How would they know? ;-)

[#86812] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/30

On Sunday 30 November 2003 03:57 pm, Peter wrote:

[#86824] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/11/30

> > I like the proper separation, but why pre and post for extrinsic and def

[#86831] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/30

On Sunday 30 November 2003 09:39 pm, Peter wrote:

[#86835] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/11/30

> You're absolutely right. Hmm...Granted this is acting in accordance to an

[#86873] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/12/01

On Monday 01 December 2003 12:25 am, Peter wrote:

[#86911] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/12/01

> I was thinking about the terms. To really distinguish these two types of wraps

[#86943] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/12/02

On Monday 01 December 2003 06:58 pm, Peter wrote:

[#87024] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/12/02

> OK as in so-so, or OK as in yes? If just so-so we'll find something better. I

[#87034] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/12/02

Peter:

[#87068] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/12/03

[snip]

[#87242] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/12/04

On Wednesday 03 December 2003 03:21 am, Peter wrote:

[#87478] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/12/07

Here is an intereseting problem that I'm currently facing and which is related

[#87481] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/12/07

> As always, I may be over looking the obvious. But if anyone has a current

[#87491] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/12/08

On Sunday 07 December 2003 08:02 pm, Peter wrote:

[#87575] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/12/09

Hi Tom,

[#87609] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/12/09

On Tuesday 09 December 2003 01:05 am, Peter wrote:

[#87686] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/12/10

> QUICK SIDE NOTE: might be nice to have something for all those dang ends. How

[#87688] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/12/10

On Wednesday 10 December 2003 05:16 am, Peter wrote:

[#87713] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/12/10

> Mine too! But I was joking :) Well, half way. It would be nice to have a good

[#87731] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/12/10

On Wednesday 10 December 2003 05:55 pm, Peter wrote:

[#87747] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/12/11

> Well, I thought of using the underscores to allow one to indent as needed to

[#87761] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/12/11

On Thursday 11 December 2003 04:04 am, Peter wrote:

[#86655] anything disappearing from Ruby for 2.0? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

62 messages 2003/11/28
[#86710] Re: anything disappearing from Ruby for 2.0? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/29

Hi,

[#86737] Re: anything disappearing from Ruby for 2.0? — Michael Campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2003/11/30

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#86779] Re: anything disappearing from Ruby for 2.0? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/30

Hi,

[#86661] rdoc included in standard distribution? — Chad Fowler <chad@...>

I've seen various plans for this dating back more than a year. Is it

16 messages 2003/11/29

[#86669] Class-level readers and writers — Carl Youngblood <carl@...>

I've been working with the class attribute shortcuts that Hal introduced

36 messages 2003/11/29
[#86675] Re: Class-level readers and writers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2003/11/29

Hi --

[#86722] Re: Class-level readers and writers — Carl Youngblood <carl@...> 2003/11/29

> (Just as a footnote, you can also use "normal" accessor shortcuts at

[#86723] Re: Class-level readers and writers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2003/11/29

Hi --

[#86728] Re: Class-level readers and writers — "Christoph" <chr_mail@...> 2003/11/29

David A. Black wrote:

[#86752] Re: Class-level readers and writers — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/30

On Saturday 29 November 2003 10:59 pm, Christoph wrote:

[#86782] Re: Class-level readers and writers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2003/11/30

Hello --

[#86801] Re: Class-level readers and writers — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/30

On Sunday 30 November 2003 12:11 pm, David A. Black wrote:

[#86807] Re: Class-level readers and writers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2003/11/30

Hi --

[#86808] Re: Class-level readers and writers — ts <decoux@...> 2003/11/30

>>>>> "D" == David A Black <dblack@wobblini.net> writes:

[#86815] Re: Class-level readers and writers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2003/11/30

Hi --

[#86673] New to ruby--trouble with initializing arrays — vanjac12@... (Van Jacques)

I am writing a practice program; the Game of Life. Naturally I am having troubles.

11 messages 2003/11/29

[#86784] Re: anything disappearing from Ruby for 2.0? — "Gavri Savio Fernandez" <Gavri_F@...>

> From: Chris Uppal [mailto:chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org]

21 messages 2003/11/30
[#86800] Re: anything disappearing from Ruby for 2.0? — "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@...> 2003/11/30

Gavri Savio Fernandez wrote:

Re: Need library for parsing configuration files

From: "Josef 'Jupp' SCHUGT" <jupp@...>
Date: 2003-11-29 22:03:04 UTC
List: ruby-talk #86730
Hi!

* David A. Black; 2003-11-29, 12:30 UTC:
> I'm also wondering about just putting
> 
>    @stars = true
>    @host  = 'localhost'
> 
> in your config file. Are you avoiding that because you use Conf
> later? Or is there a security issue?

The initialization routine that maps Conf to several variables is
only a small part of the program. Well perhaps things become clearer
if I quote the comments that are in that config file (see below). In
addition to what they describe all options but the password can be
provided as commandline arguments, too.

The parser for the command line arguments and for the config file are
derived from a common base class that holds the internal
representation of the external data. The third class derived from
that base class is the effective settings. It takes the information
provided by means of config file and commandline and merges them
thereby taking into account interdependencies of the data - if the
command line option overwrites the user name it is assumed that this
requires a different password. Finally the user is asked to provide
missing informations. In most cases this will be the password,
sometimes it may be user name and password.

When parsing the config file the assignment is mainly used for
clarity. Some options are not necessarily present in the config file
and in those cases the asignment results in 'nil' - that special
value is used lateron to stand for 'insert commandline option or
interacive input here'.

# This file has been automatically generated by popclient.rb
# 
# This file is pure Ruby code so that you can easily change options by editing
# them - provided of course you have some basic knowledge of Ruby :-)
#
# When a configuration entry is not present it is either replaced by a
# reasonable default (stars: yes, host: localhost, port: 110 (standard port
# used for POP), apop: false, filter: value of Default_filter, logfile:
# Default_logfile) or the user is prompted to provide the value to be used
# (user, pass). Details:
#
#  - Conf['stars'] is a boolean value that controls password feedback.
#     - when set to true every character of the password is echoed as a '*'
#     - when set to false there is no feedback when a password is entered.
#  - Conf['host'] is a string that contains the host to connect to. You can use
#    host names as well as IPs.
#  - Conf['port'] is an integer that is the port to connect to. It must be in
#    the acceptable range of 1 through 65535. Otherwise the value is ignored
#    and replaced by the default POP port which is 110.
#  - Conf['user'] is a string that contains the user to log in.
#  - Conf['pass'] is a string that contains the password to use for login.
#  - Conf['apop'] is a boolean value that controls the protocol to be used.
#     - when set to true APOP is used
#     - when set to false POP version 3 (POP3) is used.
#  - Conf['filter'] is the name of the filter file to be used.
#  - Conf['charset'] is the character set used by the terminal
#  - Conf['statistics'] is a boolean value that controls statistics output
#     - when set to true statistics is printed
#     - when set to false statistics is suppressed
#  - Conf['confirmation'] is a boolean value that controls confirmation before
#    deleting messages
#     - when set to true confirmation is required
#     - when set to false no confirmation is needed
#  - Conf['deliver'] is a boolean value that controls wether messages are
#    delivered
#     - when set to true messages are delivered
#     - when set to false messages are kept on server
#  - Conf['filerules'] is the name of a file with rules for sorting mails into
#    different mailboxes.
#  - Conf['logfile'] is the name of the log file to be used. To switch off
#    logging set value to '/dev/null'

BTW: The program that uses this config file is available at

    http://dwd.da.ru/linux/soft/popclient/index.html

It works flawlessly for me but I want to do some before providing it
as rubyforge :-)

Josef 'Jupp' Schugt
-- 
begin  SPAM-POLICY.txt.vbs
if msg.size > 100 kB or msg.sender.is_spammer or msg.text.is_spam
   discard message
end

In This Thread