From: Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...>
Date: 2003-11-28T07:04:03+09:00
Subject: Re: Method wrapping

> This will probably be illegal since wrapper arity differs from
> the primary arity.

Oh... Is there any specific reason for that? But now you got me wondering,
are you saying then that the signatures must match exactly (like the
number of arguments with default values, whether it's variable-length,
...)? That sounds restrictive... But then again, what's the intention of
those wrappers?

Peter