From: Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...>
Date: 2003-11-28T02:42:01+09:00
Subject: Re: Method wrapping

> In other words we don't need to overburden the wrapping mechinism with
> functionality we arleady have that more clearly seperates concerns. A method
> and its wraps within the same class should be seen as a whole, not separate
> methods. So *redefining* should effect them all.

That would be ideal, but my point was that I don't see how you are going
to do that in anyone can wrap any method. It would be cool if it were a
whole, but those wrapper can be bits and pieces from more than one
person's code. You'd need a way to enforce that "affect them all" thingy.

> But the naming thing does spark some interesting notions. I will consider this
> in detail to figure out how it could/would work. Let you know what I come up
> with.

Waiting :-)

> It's good to think about b/c it is a actually an additional paradigm for
> coding and we should get it right. Have you read my AOP RCR?

Nope. But I will then, and let you know how I feel about it.

Peter