From: Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>
Date: 2003-11-24T12:53:08+09:00
Subject: Re: Time#succ ?

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In message "Time#succ ?"
>     on 03/11/24, Hal Fulton <hal9000@hypermetrics.com> writes:
> 
> |Should this be added? It would enable the creation
> |of Time ranges like t1..t2 and so on.
> |
> |I'd assume that seconds would be the default resolution
> |(although the actual resolution is platform-dependent).
> 
> I like the idea.  How should I treat sub-second value?
> 
>   n = Time.now
>   p n.to_f      # 1069633904.88943
>   p n.succ.to_f # 1069633905.88943 or 1069633905.0 or 1069633906.0?

I would expect the first case.

Then n.succ.to_f would behave the same as (n+1).to_f,
isn't that correct?

Hal