From: Christoph <chr_mail@...>
Date: 2003-11-18T19:20:06+09:00
Subject: Re: Yet Another Rite Thought: method combination

ts  wrote:

... 
> R> Well, def foo:wrap still defines a method,
> 
>  Are you sure ?
> 
>  Now how do you see that super don't follow the inheritence 
> hierarchy ?
> 
>  In the example, matz use only one class, difficult to speak 
> about  inheritence with only one class

So the meaning of super varies when used in the wrap context.
What will be the meaning of super when used in foo:pre or  
foo:post? While I kind of like the hook scheme I am not sure
I if like this C++/Java-ish keyword overloading.


/Christoph