[#84664] CGI uses file size to distinguish between regular values and files — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...>

I've been having a ton of problems handling file uploads with CGI.rb

23 messages 2003/11/02
[#84674] Re: CGI uses file size to distinguish between regular values and files — Simon Kitching <simon@...> 2003/11/03

Hi David,

[#84676] Re: CGI uses file size to distinguish between regular values and files — Dmitry Borodaenko <d.borodaenko@...> 2003/11/03

On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 02:29:08PM +0900, Simon Kitching wrote:

[#84678] Re: CGI uses file size to distinguish between regular values and files — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/11/03

On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 20:12:06 +0900, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:

[#84692] Re: CGI uses file size to distinguish between regular values and files — Dmitry Borodaenko <d.borodaenko@...> 2003/11/03

On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:40:48PM +0900, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#84700] Re: CGI uses file size to distinguish between regular values and files — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/11/03

On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 04:37:19 +0900, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:

[#84701] Re: CGI uses file size to distinguish between regular values and files — Simon Kitching <simon@...> 2003/11/03

On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 10:29, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#84703] Re: CGI uses file size to distinguish between regular values and files — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/11/03

On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 06:51:43 +0900, Simon Kitching wrote:

[#84708] Re: CGI uses file size to distinguish between regular values and files — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/04

Hi,

[#84735] Managing metadata about attribute types — Simon Kitching <simon@...>

Hi,

52 messages 2003/11/05
[#84740] Re: Managing metadata about attribute types — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/11/05

On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 09:38:16 +0900, Simon Kitching wrote:

[#84741] Re: Managing metadata about attribute types — Simon Kitching <simon@...> 2003/11/05

On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 17:09, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#84762] Re: Managing metadata about attribute types — Simon Kitching <simon@...> 2003/11/06

What a vigorous discussion I seem to have triggered :-)

[#84770] Re: Managing metadata about attribute types — dblack@... 2003/11/06

Hi --

[#84780] Re: Managing metadata about attribute types — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...> 2003/11/06

On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 12:45:39 +0900

[#84858] Re: Managing metadata about attribute types — "John W. Long" <ng@...> 2003/11/08

Ryan,

[#84847] Long-running daemon acquiring giant memory footprint — Jason DiCioccio <jd@...>

I have written a long-running daemon in ruby to handle dynamic DNS updates.

16 messages 2003/11/07

[#84900] Antwort: Re: Power of Interpreted Languages — Robert.Koepferl@...

25 messages 2003/11/10
[#84914] Re: Antwort: Re: Power of Interpreted Languages — Aredridel <aredridel@...> 2003/11/10

> But, would you implement a game with ruby?

[#84917] Re: Antwort: Re: Power of Interpreted Languages — Gregory Millam <walker@...> 2003/11/10

Received: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 01:21:15 +0900

[#84920] Re: Antwort: Re: Power of Interpreted Languages — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/10

On Monday 10 November 2003 09:28 am, Gregory Millam wrote:

[#84921] Ruby/Tk Some Basic Questions — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2003/11/10

Hi,

[#84930] Re: Ruby/Tk Some Basic Questions — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2003/11/11

Hi,

[#85097] substring: to the end of the string — KONTRA Gergely <kgergely@...>

Hi!

19 messages 2003/11/14

[#85104] Microsoft's C/C++ compiler freely available — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...>

Thought this might be interesting to those stuck on win32...

23 messages 2003/11/15
[#85106] Re: Microsoft's C/C++ compiler freely available — Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...> 2003/11/15

Question:

[#85178] overload method in module_eval, how? — Simon Strandgaard <qj5nd7l02@...>

I want to overload a testcase method with debug-enabling wrapper.

13 messages 2003/11/17

[#85218] Access ftp-server through proxy — Kristian Sensen <ks@...>

14 messages 2003/11/17

[#85330] Yet Another Rite Thought: method combination — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com>

I just looked at matz' slides and I don't have a clear understanding

28 messages 2003/11/17

[#85421] Again, Rite explanation needed (keyword args and new hash syntax) — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com>

Hi gurus and nubys,

13 messages 2003/11/18

[#85488] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) )<Pine.LNX.4.44.0311171402340.1133-100000@ool-435 5dfae.dyn.optonline.net> — "Weirich, James" <James.Weirich@...>

David Black (dblack@wobblini.net) wrote:

121 messages 2003/11/18
[#85492] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) )<Pine.LNX.4.44.0311171402340.1133-100000@ool-435 5dfae.dyn.optonline.net> — Simon Kitching <simon@...> 2003/11/18

On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 10:30, Weirich, James wrote:

[#85499] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) )<Pine.LNX.4.44.0311171402340.1133-100000@ool-435 5dfae.dyn.optonline.net> — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/18

On Tuesday 18 November 2003 02:06 pm, Simon Kitching wrote:

[#85523] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/11/19

On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 08:08:25 +0900, Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#85582] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/19

On Tuesday 18 November 2003 10:30 pm, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#85609] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/11/19

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 02:43:31 +0900, Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#85619] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/19

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 12:04 pm, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#85656] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/11/19

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 05:48:37 +0900, Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#85664] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/19

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 03:00 pm, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#85684] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/11/20

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 08:19:08 +0900, Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#85688] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — Simon Kitching <simon@...> 2003/11/20

On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 14:06, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#85734] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — Thien Vuong <tvuong@...> 2003/11/20

[#85748] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/11/20

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:52:17 +0900, Thien Vuong wrote:

[#85854] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/20

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 10:47 pm, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#85858] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — dblack@... 2003/11/20

Hi --

[#85895] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/20

Hi,

[#85906] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2003/11/20

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#85908] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/20

On Thursday 20 November 2003 02:40 pm, Chad Fowler wrote:

[#85938] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/21

Hi,

[#85940] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/21

On Thursday 20 November 2003 06:47 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#85944] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/21

Hi,

[#85951] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/21

On Thursday 20 November 2003 07:58 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#85970] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/21

Hi,

[#85997] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/21

On Friday 21 November 2003 02:20 am, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#86046] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/21

Hi,

[#86071] Method wrapper question (was "stereotyping (was ...)) — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/11/22

On Saturday, November 22, 2003, 10:53:39 AM, Yukihiro wrote:

[#86085] Re: Method wrapper question (was "stereotyping (was ...)) — ts <decoux@...> 2003/11/22

>>>>> "G" == Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@soyabean.com.au> writes:

[#86090] Re: Method wrapper question (was "stereotyping (was ...)) — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/11/22

On Saturday, November 22, 2003, 11:47:50 PM, ts wrote:

[#86091] Re: Method wrapper question (was "stereotyping (was ...)) — ts <decoux@...> 2003/11/22

>>>>> "G" == Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@soyabean.com.au> writes:

[#86092] Re: Method wrapper question (was "stereotyping (was ...)) — "Christoph" <chr_mail@...> 2003/11/22

ts wrote:

[#86093] Re: Method wrapper question (was "stereotyping (was ...)) — ts <decoux@...> 2003/11/22

>>>>> "C" == Christoph <chr_mail@gmx.net> writes:

[#86095] Re: Method wrapper question (was "stereotyping (was ...)) — "Christoph" <chr_mail@...> 2003/11/22

ts wrote:

[#85590] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2003/11/19

Hi --

[#85597] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/19

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 10:33 am, David A. Black wrote:

[#85599] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/19

Hi,

[#85604] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/19

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 11:14 am, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#85503] String startswith/endswith in Ruby? — Dave Benjamin <ramen@...>

Hi all,

12 messages 2003/11/18

[#85518] Multi-dimensioned sparse array ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...>

Does anyone have an implementation of a multi-dimensioned sparse array?

14 messages 2003/11/19
[#85527] Re: Multi-dimensioned sparse array ? — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/11/19

On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:21:19 +0900, Charles Hixson wrote:

[#85526] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) )<Pine.LNX.4.44.0311171402340.1133-100000@ool-4355dfae.dyn.optonline.net> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311181524130.2236-100000@ool-4355dfae.dyn.optonline.net> — Thien Vuong <tvuong@...>

54 messages 2003/11/19
[#85544] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) — dblack@... 2003/11/19

[Apologies to anyone whose threading is getting messed up by the

[#85583] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/19

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 03:55 am, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:

[#85588] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2003/11/19

Hi --

[#85595] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/19

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 10:27 am, David A. Black wrote:

[#85598] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/19

Hi,

[#85601] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/19

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 11:05 am, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#85605] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2003/11/19

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#85612] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/19

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 11:46 am, Chad Fowler wrote:

[#85617] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) — Maik Schmidt <contact@...> 2003/11/19

Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#85629] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/19

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 12:42 pm, Maik Schmidt wrote:

[#85543] Re: $& write-protected? — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "S" == Simon Strandgaard <none> writes:

14 messages 2003/11/19

[#85547] x.f! RCR — Greg McIntyre <greg@...>

It bugs me that some methods have a ! on the end and some don't. It

20 messages 2003/11/19

[#85698] Re: "stereotyping" — Michael Campbell <michael_s_campbell@...>

Sean O'Dell wrote:

19 messages 2003/11/20
[#85701] Re: "stereotyping" — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2003/11/20

On Wednesday 19 November 2003 07:01 pm, Michael Campbell wrote:

[#85704] Re: "stereotyping" — Michael campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2003/11/20

Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#85718] Re: "stereotyping" — Clifford Heath <cjh_nospam@...> 2003/11/20

Michael campbell wrote:

[#85757] Re: "stereotyping" — Julian Fitzell <julian@...4.com> 2003/11/20

Clifford Heath wrote:

[#85913] Re: "stereotyping" — Clifford Heath <cjh_nospam@...> 2003/11/20

Julian Fitzell wrote:

[#85713] Re: [ANN] win32-clipboard 0.1.0 — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Oops - forgot the link:

14 messages 2003/11/20

[#85766] learning the "Ruby way" — mark.wirdnam@... (Mark Wirdnam)

**Hobby-programmer alarm**

24 messages 2003/11/20
[#85863] Re: learning the "Ruby way" — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2003/11/20

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Mark Wirdnam wrote:

[#85821] iterator 0.1 — Simon Strandgaard <qj5nd7l02@...>

homepage:

22 messages 2003/11/20

[#85870] Re: "stereotyping" — Michael Campbell <michael_s_campbell@...>

Sean O'Dell wrote:

17 messages 2003/11/20

[#85886] Partial Euphoric Type Checking — "T. Onoma" <transami@...>

Greetings all Type Checkers!

16 messages 2003/11/20
[#85948] Re: Partial Euphoric Type Checking (now Ducked!) — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/21

quack! quack! I added duck typing capability to my euphoric type checking

[#85952] Re: Partial Euphoric Type Checking (Super Duck!?) — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/21

Now some for some rally crazy cross thought. First a complete interface

[#85957] Re: Partial Euphoric Type Checking (Super Duck!?) — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/21

for some cross rally some thought crazy. ( read: i need a type system for my

[#85981] Re: Partial Euphoric Type Checking (Super Duck!?) — Chris Morris <chrismo@...> 2003/11/21

> you see we have a problem here. it doesn't matter what methods are

[#85987] Re: Partial Euphoric Type Checking (Super Duck!?) — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/11/21

> > you see we have a problem here. it doesn't matter what methods are

[#85888] New Type Checking System Idea — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...>

Taking comments into consideration, a totally new approach strikes me

22 messages 2003/11/20

[#85947] RubyConf 2003 Presentations Posted — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

In absolute record time (5 days compared to 3 months), rubyconf 2003

11 messages 2003/11/21

[#86007] Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types) ) — "Weirich, James" <James.Weirich@...>

> This is a wonderful idea. Let me restate it to make sure I

13 messages 2003/11/21

[#86127] Ruby classes for MP3 de-/encoding — Dennis Oelkers <dennis@...>

Hello folks,

12 messages 2003/11/22

[#86183] "wrong argument type nil (expected String)" from Dir.chdir — Tim Kynerd <vxbrw58s02@...>

I'm running Ruby 1.6.8.

13 messages 2003/11/23

[#86202] Message "Insecure world writable dir ..." — Harry Ohlsen <harryo@...>

When File.popen() is passed an executable whose path contains a world writable directory, it produces a warning message.

19 messages 2003/11/24

[#86215] Library path relative to current .rb file — zoranlazarevic@... (Zoran Lazarevic)

One of the most irritating (missing) features of Ruby is inability to

12 messages 2003/11/24

[#86265] raise unless RUBY_VERSION[%r/^\s*\d+\.\d+/o].to_f >= 1.8 — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...>

25 messages 2003/11/24

[#86344] Re: Controlled block variables — "T. Onoma" <transami@...>

On Wednesday 26 November 2003 09:10 am, Guy Decoux wrote:

42 messages 2003/11/26
[#86346] Re: Controlled block variables — ts <decoux@...> 2003/11/26

>>>>> "T" == T Onoma <transami@runbox.com> writes:

[#86347] Re: Controlled block variables — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/26

On Wednesday 26 November 2003 09:56 am, ts wrote:

[#86369] Re: Controlled block variables — Dan Doel <djd15@...> 2003/11/26

I actually have wondered in the past why there isn't an #eval that takes

[#86390] Re: Controlled block variables — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/26

On Wednesday 26 November 2003 03:57 pm, Dan Doel wrote:

[#86360] turning a string into array of ASCII bytes — David Garamond <lists@...6.isreserved.com>

What is the shortest, most straightforward way (without temporary

17 messages 2003/11/26

[#86391] Method wrapping — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>

I've come late into the thread on this, and I haven't read all

62 messages 2003/11/26
[#86445] Re: Method wrapping — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/26

Hi,

[#86457] Re: Method wrapping — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2003/11/27

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#86462] Re: Method wrapping — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/27

Hi,

[#86470] Re: Method wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/27

On Thursday 27 November 2003 07:07 am, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#86493] Re: Method wrapping — "Christoph" <chr_mail@...> 2003/11/27

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#86498] Re: Method wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/11/27

> I have asked the same this question as well and I really wish

[#86508] Re: Method wrapping — "Christoph" <chr_mail@...> 2003/11/27

From: Peter wrote:

[#86512] Re: Method wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/11/27

> This sound all good and well however this does not change the

[#86550] pre/post question/idea — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hello --

21 messages 2003/11/28

[#86646] Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...>

Its important that we clearly seperate the issue of "surface" syntax from the

54 messages 2003/11/28
[#86657] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/11/28

> Thoughts?

[#86692] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/29

On Saturday 29 November 2003 12:44 am, Peter wrote:

[#86707] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/11/29

> I originally had a small paragraph touching on this, but I took it out b/c I

[#86726] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/29

On Saturday 29 November 2003 04:26 pm, Peter wrote:

[#86734] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/11/30

> The join-points are the only thing required to facilitate all of this. So I

[#86747] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/30

On Sunday 30 November 2003 01:01 am, Peter wrote:

[#86794] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/11/30

> How would they know? ;-)

[#86812] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/30

On Sunday 30 November 2003 03:57 pm, Peter wrote:

[#86824] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/11/30

> > I like the proper separation, but why pre and post for extrinsic and def

[#86831] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/30

On Sunday 30 November 2003 09:39 pm, Peter wrote:

[#86835] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/11/30

> You're absolutely right. Hmm...Granted this is acting in accordance to an

[#86873] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/12/01

On Monday 01 December 2003 12:25 am, Peter wrote:

[#86911] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/12/01

> I was thinking about the terms. To really distinguish these two types of wraps

[#86943] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/12/02

On Monday 01 December 2003 06:58 pm, Peter wrote:

[#87024] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/12/02

> OK as in so-so, or OK as in yes? If just so-so we'll find something better. I

[#87034] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/12/02

Peter:

[#87068] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/12/03

[snip]

[#87242] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/12/04

On Wednesday 03 December 2003 03:21 am, Peter wrote:

[#87478] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/12/07

Here is an intereseting problem that I'm currently facing and which is related

[#87481] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/12/07

> As always, I may be over looking the obvious. But if anyone has a current

[#87491] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/12/08

On Sunday 07 December 2003 08:02 pm, Peter wrote:

[#87575] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/12/09

Hi Tom,

[#87609] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/12/09

On Tuesday 09 December 2003 01:05 am, Peter wrote:

[#87686] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/12/10

> QUICK SIDE NOTE: might be nice to have something for all those dang ends. How

[#87688] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/12/10

On Wednesday 10 December 2003 05:16 am, Peter wrote:

[#87713] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/12/10

> Mine too! But I was joking :) Well, half way. It would be nice to have a good

[#87731] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/12/10

On Wednesday 10 December 2003 05:55 pm, Peter wrote:

[#87747] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/12/11

> Well, I thought of using the underscores to allow one to indent as needed to

[#87761] Re: Underpinnings of Method Wrapping — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/12/11

On Thursday 11 December 2003 04:04 am, Peter wrote:

[#86655] anything disappearing from Ruby for 2.0? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

62 messages 2003/11/28
[#86710] Re: anything disappearing from Ruby for 2.0? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/29

Hi,

[#86737] Re: anything disappearing from Ruby for 2.0? — Michael Campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2003/11/30

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#86779] Re: anything disappearing from Ruby for 2.0? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/11/30

Hi,

[#86661] rdoc included in standard distribution? — Chad Fowler <chad@...>

I've seen various plans for this dating back more than a year. Is it

16 messages 2003/11/29

[#86669] Class-level readers and writers — Carl Youngblood <carl@...>

I've been working with the class attribute shortcuts that Hal introduced

36 messages 2003/11/29
[#86675] Re: Class-level readers and writers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2003/11/29

Hi --

[#86722] Re: Class-level readers and writers — Carl Youngblood <carl@...> 2003/11/29

> (Just as a footnote, you can also use "normal" accessor shortcuts at

[#86723] Re: Class-level readers and writers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2003/11/29

Hi --

[#86728] Re: Class-level readers and writers — "Christoph" <chr_mail@...> 2003/11/29

David A. Black wrote:

[#86752] Re: Class-level readers and writers — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/30

On Saturday 29 November 2003 10:59 pm, Christoph wrote:

[#86782] Re: Class-level readers and writers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2003/11/30

Hello --

[#86801] Re: Class-level readers and writers — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2003/11/30

On Sunday 30 November 2003 12:11 pm, David A. Black wrote:

[#86807] Re: Class-level readers and writers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2003/11/30

Hi --

[#86808] Re: Class-level readers and writers — ts <decoux@...> 2003/11/30

>>>>> "D" == David A Black <dblack@wobblini.net> writes:

[#86815] Re: Class-level readers and writers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2003/11/30

Hi --

[#86673] New to ruby--trouble with initializing arrays — vanjac12@... (Van Jacques)

I am writing a practice program; the Game of Life. Naturally I am having troubles.

11 messages 2003/11/29

[#86784] Re: anything disappearing from Ruby for 2.0? — "Gavri Savio Fernandez" <Gavri_F@...>

> From: Chris Uppal [mailto:chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org]

21 messages 2003/11/30
[#86800] Re: anything disappearing from Ruby for 2.0? — "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@...> 2003/11/30

Gavri Savio Fernandez wrote:

Re: Segfault in Ruby/ODBC

From: "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...>
Date: 2003-11-10 13:29:34 UTC
List: ruby-talk #84905
Nathaniel Talbott [mailto:nathaniel@NOSPAMtalbott.ws] wrote:

> My program is causing a segfault under load, and while I'm 
> going to dig in to figuring out why, I thought I'd go ahead 
> and see if anyone here could give me a hand. It appears that 
> the Ruby/ODBC extension is somehow behaving badly, and not 
> being a C guy, I'd appreciate any help you can give me.
> 
> The backtrace below was generated off of an optimized ruby 
> without debugging info... I may be able to do it again and 
> get better information, but not immediately. Also, the 
> program itself is large and proprietary, and as with most 
> SEGFAULTs, I can't reproduce the problem except with the full 
> program under load.

OK, I have better data now. First of all, I have a small program that will
reproduce the problem, provided you have access to an odbc database:

  require 'dbi'

  threads = []
  Thread.abort_on_exception = true
  10.times do |i|
    threads << Thread.new do
      db = DBI::connect("dbi:ODBC:dbname", "user", "password")
      loop do
        p "Looping #{i}..."
        db.tables
        db.execute("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table").finish
        db.tables
        db.execute("SELECT * FROM table").finish
      end
    end
  end
  threads.each{|t| t.join}

Obviously you'd need to replace dbname, user, password and table with things
that make sense for your setup. I'm using unixODBC to connect via FreeTDS to
a MSSQL server on a Windows NT box. 

Also, I've recompiled Ruby and the odbc driver with debugging information,
and have a better backtrace:

  (gdb) run
  Starting program: /usr/bin/ruby t.rb
  [New Thread 16384 (LWP 16080)]
  "Looping 0..."
  "Looping 2..."
  "Looping 1..."

  Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
  [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 16080)]
  0x400de1f5 in mallopt () from /lib/libc.so.6
  (gdb) bt
  #0  0x400de1f5 in mallopt () from /lib/libc.so.6
  #1  0x400dd383 in malloc () from /lib/libc.so.6
  #2  0x08070cf6 in ruby_xmalloc (size=16) at gc.c:108
  #3  0x080bf370 in st_init_table_with_size (type=0x81000dc, size=11) at
st.c:167
  #4  0x080bf3c8 in st_init_table (type=0x81000dc) at st.c:180
  #5  0x08073c87 in hash_alloc (klass=1075592068) at hash.c:188
  #6  0x08073cb8 in rb_hash_new () at hash.c:196
  #7  0x4022ec69 in do_fetch (q=0x819d6d0, mode=1) at odbc.c:3802
  #8  0x4022fce4 in stmt_fetch_hash1 (argc=1, argv=0xbfffabb0,
self=1075690112, bang=0)
      at odbc.c:4206
  #9  0x40230106 in stmt_each_hash (argc=0, argv=0x0, self=1075690112) at
odbc.c:4345
  #10 0x0806adb3 in call_cfunc (func=0x40230030 <stmt_each_hash>,
recv=1075690112, len=-1, argc=0,
      argv=0x0) at eval.c:4841
  #11 0x0805dc43 in rb_call0 (klass=1075735712, recv=1075690112, id=14073,
oid=14073, argc=0,
      argv=0x0, body=0x401e2164, nosuper=0) at eval.c:4975
  #12 0x0805e788 in rb_call (klass=1075735712, recv=1075690112, mid=14073,
argc=0, argv=0x0, scope=0)
      at eval.c:5196
  #13 0x0805866a in rb_eval (self=1075693732, n=0x401f75a0) at eval.c:3026
  #14 0x08057438 in rb_eval (self=1075693732, n=0x401f7a78) at eval.c:2753
  #15 0x08057979 in rb_eval (self=1075693732, n=0x401f6204) at eval.c:2839
  #16 0x0805e23f in rb_call0 (klass=1075705512, recv=1075693732, id=10217,
oid=10217, argc=0,
      argv=0x0, body=0x401f6204, nosuper=0) at eval.c:5103
  #17 0x0805e788 in rb_call (klass=1075705512, recv=1075693732, mid=10217,
argc=0, argv=0x0, scope=0)
      at eval.c:5196
  #18 0x0805866a in rb_eval (self=1075695672, n=0x401ab2dc) at eval.c:3026
  #19 0x0805e23f in rb_call0 (klass=1075842852, recv=1075695672, id=10217,
oid=10217, argc=0,
      argv=0x0, body=0x401ab2dc, nosuper=0) at eval.c:5103
  #20 0x0805e788 in rb_call (klass=1075842852, recv=1075695672, mid=10217,
argc=0, argv=0x0, scope=0)
      at eval.c:5196
  #21 0x0805866a in rb_eval (self=1075620448, n=0x401baf98) at eval.c:3026
  #22 0x0805c050 in rb_yield_0 (val=6, self=1075620448, klass=0, flags=0,
avalue=0) at eval.c:4229
  #23 0x0805c432 in rb_f_loop () at eval.c:4330
  #24 0x0806adcd in call_cfunc (func=0x805c418 <rb_f_loop>, recv=1075620448,
len=0, argc=0, argv=0x0)
      at eval.c:4844
  #25 0x0805dc43 in rb_call0 (klass=1075625128, recv=1075620448, id=3921,
oid=3921, argc=0,
      argv=0x0, body=0x401ca1a0, nosuper=0) at eval.c:4975
  #26 0x0805e788 in rb_call (klass=1075625128, recv=1075620448, mid=3921,
argc=0, argv=0x0, scope=1)
      at eval.c:5196
  #27 0x08058924 in rb_eval (self=1075620448, n=0x401bad7c) at eval.c:3041
  #28 0x08057438 in rb_eval (self=1075620448, n=0x401bad04) at eval.c:2753
  #29 0x0805c050 in rb_yield_0 (val=1075838972, self=1075620448, klass=0,
flags=2, avalue=2)
      at eval.c:4229
  #30 0x08068e60 in rb_thread_yield (arg=1075838972, th=0x816efd8) at
eval.c:9581
  #31 0x08068b04 in rb_thread_start_0 (fn=0x8068d94 <rb_thread_yield>,
arg=0x401ffffc, th=0x816efd8)
      at eval.c:9495
  #32 0x08068f53 in rb_thread_initialize (thread=1075839612,
args=1075838972) at eval.c:9610
  #33 0x0806ad94 in call_cfunc (func=0x8068f04 <rb_thread_initialize>,
recv=1075839612, len=-2,
      argc=0, argv=0x0) at eval.c:4838
  #34 0x0805dc43 in rb_call0 (klass=1075609928, recv=1075839612, id=2953,
oid=2953, argc=0,
      argv=0x0, body=0x401c80e4, nosuper=0) at eval.c:4975
  #35 0x0805e788 in rb_call (klass=1075609928, recv=1075839612, mid=2953,
argc=0, argv=0x0, scope=1)
      at eval.c:5196
  #36 0x0805e9ba in rb_funcall2 (recv=1075839612, mid=2953, argc=0,
argv=0x0) at eval.c:5271
  #37 0x0806124c in rb_obj_call_init (obj=1075839612, argc=0, argv=0x0) at
eval.c:6341
  #38 0x08068eb4 in rb_thread_s_new (argc=0, argv=0x0, klass=1075609928) at
eval.c:9594
  #39 0x0806adb3 in call_cfunc (func=0x8068e74 <rb_thread_s_new>,
recv=1075609928, len=-1, argc=0,
      argv=0x0) at eval.c:4841
  #40 0x0805dc43 in rb_call0 (klass=1075609908, recv=1075609928, id=3353,
oid=3353, argc=0,
      argv=0x0, body=0x401c810c, nosuper=0) at eval.c:4975
  #41 0x0805e788 in rb_call (klass=1075609908, recv=1075609928, mid=3353,
argc=0, argv=0x0, scope=0)
      at eval.c:5196
  #42 0x0805866a in rb_eval (self=1075620448, n=0x401bb254) at eval.c:3026
  #43 0x08057438 in rb_eval (self=1075620448, n=0x401bacf0) at eval.c:2753
  #44 0x08058506 in rb_eval (self=1075620448, n=0x401bacb4) at eval.c:3021
  #45 0x0805c050 in rb_yield_0 (val=1, self=1075620448, klass=0, flags=0,
avalue=0) at eval.c:4229
  #46 0x0805c306 in rb_yield (val=1) at eval.c:4282
  #47 0x08087af3 in int_dotimes (num=21) at numeric.c:1775
  #48 0x0806adcd in call_cfunc (func=0x8087aac <int_dotimes>, recv=21,
len=0, argc=0, argv=0x0)
      at eval.c:4844
  #49 0x0805dc43 in rb_call0 (klass=1075606888, recv=21, id=5385, oid=5385,
argc=0, argv=0x0,
      body=0x401c74a0, nosuper=0) at eval.c:4975
  #50 0x0805e788 in rb_call (klass=1075606888, recv=21, mid=5385, argc=0,
argv=0x0, scope=0)
      at eval.c:5196
  #51 0x0805866a in rb_eval (self=1075620448, n=0x401bb2e0) at eval.c:3026
  #52 0x08057438 in rb_eval (self=1075620448, n=0x401bb3bc) at eval.c:2753
  #53 0x08053a80 in eval_node (self=1075620448, node=0x401bb3bc) at
eval.c:1217
  #54 0x0805408a in ruby_exec () at eval.c:1387
  #55 0x0805410d in ruby_run () at eval.c:1408
  #56 0x08051f93 in main (argc=2, argv=0xbffff704, envp=0xbffff710) at
main.c:50
  (gdb) c
  Continuing.
  /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/DBD/ODBC/ODBC.rb:124: [BUG] Segmentation fault
  ruby 1.8.1 (2003-10-31) [i386-linux]


  Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
  0x400955f1 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6

I'm going to dig in to this and see if I can figure out what the problem is,
but any help would be appreciated. Let me know if there's any more
information I can provide that would be useful.

Thanks,


Nathaniel

<:((><



In This Thread