From: Dan Sugalski <dan@...>
Date: 2003-10-10T02:08:31+09:00
Subject: Re: 'Spamicity' value

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Martin DeMello wrote:

> Mauricio Fern?ndez <batsman.geo@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 06:59:51PM +0900, jam_kernovitch@youngnature.com wrote:
> >
> > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.5 required=5.0
> > tests=COPYRIGHT_CLAIMED,CTYPE_JUST_HTML,NO_MX_FOR_FROM,RCVD_IN_ORBZ
> > version=2.20
> >
> > Maybe it's time to lower the required 'spamicity' value to 4.5...
>
> Ack! I fall foul of the current limit often enough - I'd hate to think
> of the problems I'd have with a lower threshold.

More likely an upgrade to a newer version of SpamAssassin (2.60 seems
pretty good so far) and some training of its Bayesian filters, though the
latter is a bit of work for an otherwise automated system.

					Dan