From: "Berger, Daniel" Date: 2003-09-12T07:01:37+09:00 Subject: Re: backup under privileged mode (unix permissions) > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean O'Dell [mailto:sean@cSePlsoAfMt.com[REMOVE_THE_SPAM]] > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:54 PM > To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org > Subject: Re: backup under privileged mode (unix permissions) > > > Simon Strandgaard wrote: > > I have some data which I make a backup of on daily basis. > > The data has many different owners/groups. > > > > I have writen some Ruby which does the job (when logged in > as root). I > > don't like running things as root, so I have created a dedicated > > account only for backup, under which the backup script is > supposed to > > be executed. > > > > Unfortunatly I cannot figure out the last part (running the ruby > > script with root read-permissions). > > > > Q1: How should I setup the right permissions (setuid, > /etc/group), any > > ideas ? > > Q2: How do you execute your backup scripts with the right > permissions ? > > It gets complicated (I've been there), and sometimes you just have to > say "hey, that's what root is for." > > Assuming your backup script isn't executing anything else through the > "system" method and such, you probably can't make much use out of > playing with the real/effective user id's. Your problem is probably > strictly that you need permission to read the files you need > backed up. > > First thought: run it as root. IMO, that's one of the few > things root > is really there for. > > A slightly less "certain" method would be to make your backup user a > member of every group who might own files you want to back > up. You do > this by editing the /etc/group file so that each group you > want to add > backup to looks something like this: > > groupname:x:user,backup > > .... then the backup user will have group permissions for every file > whose group is one of those groups. Unfortunately, if the file is > readable by the user, but not by the group the file is owned by, your > backup script will still not be able to read the file. > > So, back to square one: run it as root. =) > > Sean O'Dell There's always 'sudo'. Dan