[#80776] prerelease of Guis-1.3pre1 (a GTK widget server) for Ruby — Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile@...>

Dear All,

11 messages 2003/09/01

[#80849] Simple question(s) — Michael Campbell <michael_s_campbell@...>

(I think...)

16 messages 2003/09/02

[#80870] show me the ruby way — nord ehacedod <nordehacedod@...>

This works, but there must be a more natural way to do

18 messages 2003/09/02
[#80916] Re: show me the ruby way — aero6dof@... (Alan Chen) 2003/09/02

ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote in message news:<200309021525.h82FPkM17085@moulon.inra.fr>...

[#80918] Re: show me the ruby way — "Warren Brown" <wkb@...> 2003/09/02

alan,

[#80873] RDoc: how to turn off automatic linking for a word? — leikind@... (Yuri Leikind)

Hello all,

12 messages 2003/09/02
[#80962] Re: RDoc: how to turn off automatic linking for a word? — William Webber <wew@...> 2003/09/03

On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:32:23AM +0900, Yuri Leikind wrote:

[#81014] unknown node type 0 — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>

Hello, all.

15 messages 2003/09/03

[#81028] webrick and ruby — ahoward <ahoward@...>

12 messages 2003/09/03

[#81057] WEBrick and mod_ruby performance — quixoticsycophant@... (Jeff Mitchell)

I've been scoping out ruby for an upcoming server project.

16 messages 2003/09/03

[#81075] Unit Tests and Encapsulation — Scott Thompson <easco@...>

This may be off-topic in a Ruby list, although I have noticed that a

18 messages 2003/09/04

[#81167] Difference between .. and ... in boolean ranges — Oliver Dain <odain2@...>

I'm a bit confused by some Ruby behavior I'm seeing with ranges. As I

12 messages 2003/09/04

[#81234] Correction: "religious" — Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...>

It has come to my attention that the word religious can, indeed, be

12 messages 2003/09/05

[#81239] rcalc 2.0 (Ruby Calculator) — "Josef 'Jupp' Schugt" <jupp@...>

Saluton!

14 messages 2003/09/05

[#81345] ANN: MetaTags 1.0 — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...>

MetaTags 1.0

73 messages 2003/09/08
[#81361] Re: ANN: MetaTags 1.0 — Tobias Peters <tpeters@...> 2003/09/08

Ryan Pavlik wrote:

[#81371] Re: ANN: MetaTags 1.0 — why the lucky stiff <ruby-talk@...> 2003/09/08

On Monday 08 September 2003 06:58 am, Tobias Peters wrote:

[#81384] Re: ANN: MetaTags 1.0 — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2003/09/08

On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, why the lucky stiff wrote:

[#81386] Re: ANN: MetaTags 1.0 — dblack@... 2003/09/08

Hi --

[#81394] Re: ANN: MetaTags 1.0 — why the lucky stiff <ruby-talk@...> 2003/09/08

On Monday 08 September 2003 12:08 pm, dblack@superlink.net wrote:

[#81396] Re: ANN: MetaTags 1.0 — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2003/09/08

why the lucky stiff wrote:

[#81452] Re: ANN: MetaTags 1.0 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/09/09

Hi,

[#81454] Re: ANN: MetaTags 1.0 — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2003/09/09

[#81615] Re: ANN: MetaTags 1.0 — Richard Kilmer <rich@...> 2003/09/10

On Monday, September 8, 2003, at 11:59 PM, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#81374] problem with Module#append_features — Ferenc Engard <ferenc@...>

Hi all,

24 messages 2003/09/08

[#81503] Memory consumption of Ruby/mod_ruby combo on Apache — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...>

I'm seeing memory consumption in the area of 30-35mb per Apache process

12 messages 2003/09/09
[#81504] Re: Memory consumption of Ruby/mod_ruby combo on Apache — mgarriss <mgarriss@...> 2003/09/09

David Heinemeier Hansson wrote:

[#81535] using a filter inside Ruby — Eric Schwartz <emschwar@...>

I've the contents of a raw log file in memory, and a program that will

12 messages 2003/09/09

[#81587] Fwd: Calling fun taking struct and not pointer to struct? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Related to the recent thread about nested structs

16 messages 2003/09/10
[#81590] Re: Calling fun taking struct and not pointer to struct? — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...> 2003/09/10

Robert Feldt [mailto:feldt@ce.chalmers.se] wrote:

[#81594] Re: Calling fun taking struct and not pointer to struct? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2003/09/10

Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@NOSPAMtalbott.ws> skrev den Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:42:24 +0900:

[#81596] Re: Calling fun taking struct and not pointer to struct? — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...> 2003/09/10

Robert Feldt [mailto:feldt@ce.chalmers.se] wrote:

[#81597] Re: Calling fun taking struct and not pointer to struct? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2003/09/10

Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@NOSPAMtalbott.ws> skrev den Thu, 11 Sep 2003 00:06:18 +0900:

[#81612] What *are* variables? Which are nil now? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

Reading about reflection, ObjectSpace will give you the objects in

22 messages 2003/09/10
[#81632] Re: What *are* variables? Which are nil now? — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/09/10

> raise "@b1 is nil" if @b1.nil

[#81623] Chasing a garbage collection bug — "Thomas Sondergaard" <thomas@...>

I just discovered that I have a GC related bug, or that is to say it doesn't

17 messages 2003/09/10

[#81755] Passing an Object Class from a method to a caller — "RLMuller" <RLMuller@...>

Hi All,

14 messages 2003/09/11

[#81840] Re: Dir.foreach not with patterns? — "Weirich, James" <James.Weirich@...>

I like the Dir[] form (or its "glob" alternative). I used to write

14 messages 2003/09/12
[#82500] Re: Dir.foreach not with patterns? — Jason Creighton <androflux@...> 2003/09/19

On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 15:59:25 +0100

[#81871] Duck Typing — Jim Weirich <jweirich@...>

In the Method Redefinition thread, this explanation of Duck Typing is

38 messages 2003/09/13
[#81884] Re: Duck Typing — dblack@... 2003/09/13

Hi --

[#81929] actual debian ruby packages are unuseable with tk — Ferenc Engard <ferenc@...>

Dear debian ruby package maintainers,

12 messages 2003/09/13

[#81960] Dot versus double-colon — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>

OK, I've been thinking (always dangerous after 11 pm).

18 messages 2003/09/14

[#82012] performance and style advice requested — Alex Martelli <aleaxit@...>

I'm trying to learn some Ruby, so I want to write some Ruby code, starting

53 messages 2003/09/14
[#82028] Re: performance and style advice requested — Ben Giddings <bg-rubytalk@...> 2003/09/14

Some style advice:

[#82029] Linguistics 0.02 — Michael Granger <ged@...>

Hi fellow Rubyists,

19 messages 2003/09/14

[#82056] Test::Unit -- multiple errors in test method ??? — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

14 messages 2003/09/15

[#82166] scrambler one-liner — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>

I just came across this interesting article at Slashdot that explains that

27 messages 2003/09/16

[#82206] #{} and \" don't like each other — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...>

From the Programming Ruby book:

32 messages 2003/09/16

[#82419] wiki reccomendations — ahoward <ahoward@...>

15 messages 2003/09/18

[#82448] closing stderr — Michael Garriss <mgarriss@...>

I would like to prevent some output that is going to stderr during a

15 messages 2003/09/18

[#82547] fork not available? — walter@...

I am running windows 2000 using the PragProgs install.

14 messages 2003/09/19

[#82561] Trouble with binary files? — <agemoagemo@...>

I'm trying to write a program that will read a binary

24 messages 2003/09/19
[#82562] Re: Trouble with binary files? — Heinz Werntges <werntges@...> 2003/09/19

agemoagemo@yahoo.com wrote:

[#82583] Re: Trouble with binary files? — Tim Hammerquist <tim@...> 2003/09/19

<agemoagemo@yahoo.com> graced us by uttering:

[#82575] Article on oreilly.net on how to build Unix tools with Ruby — Xavier <NOSPAM@...>

Thought you'd like to know about this article

24 messages 2003/09/19
[#82829] Re: Article on oreilly.net on how to build Unix tools with Ruby — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2003/09/23

On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 06:00:21AM +0900, Xavier wrote:

[#82589] POP3Filter for SoBig.F Virus: — Austin Ziegler <austin@...>

Here's an updated version of the Ruby pop3filter that was written. This

32 messages 2003/09/20
[#82592] Re: POP3Filter for SoBig.F Virus: — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/09/20

I've made more updates. Rather than just putting them here, I've created a

[#82609] Re: POP3Filter for SoBig.F Virus: — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/09/20

On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 10:14:39 +0900, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#82617] Re: POP3Filter for SoBig.F Virus: — "Shashank Date" <sdate@...> 2003/09/20

[#82618] Re: POP3Filter for SoBig.F Virus: — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/09/20

On Saturday, September 20, 2003, 9:03:18 PM, Shashank wrote:

[#82621] Re: POP3Filter for SoBig.F Virus: — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/09/20

On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 22:15:40 +0900, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#82623] Re: POP3Filter for SoBig.F Virus: — Jose Quesada <quesadaj@...> 2003/09/20

On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 23:52:39 +0900, Austin Ziegler <austin@halostatue.ca>

[#82624] Re: POP3Filter for SoBig.F Virus: — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2003/09/20

On Saturday 20 September 2003 18:56, Jose Quesada wrote:

[#82632] Real emails on newsgroup version (was Re: POP3Filter) — Ben Giddings <bg-rubytalk@...> 2003/09/20

This whole worm thing brings up a question:

[#82683] Re: Real emails on newsgroup version (was Re: POP3Filter) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2003/09/22

[#82661] Performance: Ruby vs Java — lalit_pant@... (Lalit Pant)

I'm a newcomer to Ruby, and thought I would write a little

18 messages 2003/09/22

[#82715] Ruby package for Linux — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Ok, I know nothing about linux packages.

22 messages 2003/09/22

[#82832] upper to lower first letter of a word — yvon.thoravallist@... (Yvon Thoraval)

Recently, i get a vintage list (more than 500 items) with poor typo, for

30 messages 2003/09/23

[#82884] When threads block — Hans Fugal <fugalh@...>

It's difficult to do any serious multi-threaded network programming when

13 messages 2003/09/24

[#82964] Re: Prove internet package for Microsoft Internet Explorer — "Anthony Neville" <anthony.neville@...>

13 messages 2003/09/25

[#83002] TCPSocket.gethostbyname difficulties — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...>

I'm trying to use TCPSocket.gethostbyname to verify that a given domain

35 messages 2003/09/25
[#83006] Re: TCPSocket.gethostbyname difficulties — Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...> 2003/09/25

> I can browse to either of those hosts, so what's different about them? Any

[#83014] Re: TCPSocket.gethostbyname difficulties — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...> 2003/09/26

Peter [mailto:Peter.Vanbroekhoven@cs.kuleuven.ac.be] wrote:

[#83030] Re: TCPSocket.gethostbyname difficulties — ts <decoux@...> 2003/09/26

>>>>> "N" == Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@NOSPAMtalbott.ws> writes:

[#83035] Re: TCPSocket.gethostbyname difficulties — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...> 2003/09/26

ts [mailto:decoux@moulon.inra.fr] wrote:

[#83036] Re: TCPSocket.gethostbyname difficulties — ts <decoux@...> 2003/09/26

>>>>> "N" == Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@NOSPAMtalbott.ws> writes:

[#83037] Re: TCPSocket.gethostbyname difficulties — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...> 2003/09/26

ts [mailto:decoux@moulon.inra.fr] wrote:

[#83011] Adding, removing and redefining features at runtime — "Thomas Sondergaard" <thomas@...>

I am working on an article on the subject of implementing dynamically typed

23 messages 2003/09/26

[#83105] Fwd: FW: Porting Suggestions: Lucene to Ruby; Perl Text::Balanced — Erik Hatcher <erik@...>

I was alerted about me being mentioned on ruby-talk, as I was not

12 messages 2003/09/27
[#83117] OT: alerts - was Re: Fwd: FW: Porting Suggestions: Lucene to Ruby; Perl Text::Balanced — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2003/09/27

Erik Hatcher wrote:

[#83140] Thoughts on yield — nolan_d@... (Nolan J. Darilek)

I've begun working on a music-related ruby project, and recently I've

17 messages 2003/09/28

[#83223] Article on ARTIMA — Peter Hickman <peter@...>

There is the start of a series of articles on ARTIMA with Matz.

21 messages 2003/09/29

[#83310] Making == symmetric? — elbows@... (Nathan Weston)

It has always bothered me that == is not symmetric in ruby:

22 messages 2003/09/30

Re: webrick and ruby

From: Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Date: 2003-09-10 22:42:46 UTC
List: ruby-talk #81653
Robert Feldt (feldt@ce.chalmers.se) wrote:

> Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> skrev den Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:19:52 -07=
00:
>=20
> >Well, once you add Borges, you'll not need amrita or fastcgi...
> >
> But then your code will not be separated from the skin/presentation, eh?
> This seems to me to be one of the strengths of the amrita approach.
> Not that I'm an expert in any of them (just checked them out) but from
> a cursory look at borges the tight coupling between logic and presentation
> stands out as annoying. Is this something that is being adressed or is
> the tight coupling a "feature"?

Borges promotes heavy use of CSS, and tight coupling is a "feature".  In
Borges, you write web apps more like GUI apps.  Instead of spitting out
HTML, you connect Components (or widgets).  It is much different
than traditional web app development.

> More q's on borges:
>=20
> Can it not be a performance issue that you regenerate the html
> from scratch in each component? At least that was my impression
> from the few borges examples? I guess you can avoid that by using
> a different (template-based) renderer though. But this is probably
> premature optimization on my part anyway... ;)

Yes, it may be a performance hit, but its hard to say whether or not it
will be dwarfed by all the behind-the-scenes magic with Continuations.

Seaside2 has no template system, and nobody there really complains
(well, there's one guy who's writing a template based system).  A
majority of the Seaside2 developers do not use templating systems, but
there is a facility for sticking pre-generated chunks of HTML into the
code.

> Do you have any larger examples showing the strength of the
> borges approach? It is theoretically appealing and sort of
> feels right but since its a different framework
> than the predominant ones (sessions)

There's Webplayer, but it isn't as clean an app as it should be.  It
does show the general idea and power of the approach.  Webplayer is a
browser-controlled mp3 player with rudimentary playlist support.

>                                      I think you need to
> really write it on our noses for us to get it :). Does
> it give real advantages in real use? What are the downsides? Problematic
> to disallow the back-button in situations where it shouldn't be allowed?

The major advantage is that sessions are transparent.  You only
need to identify which data needs its state held.  The downside is that
it will be slower and larger (memory footprint) than a CGI-based
solution.  Code may be smaller and simpler.

The back button never needs to be disabled, but backtracking can be
forbidden for things like shopping carts (not yet implemented).

> Why don't we take some more complex web app (phpbb2?) and rewrite
> it in borges w. webrick? We can even "borrow" their themes and templates =
so=20
> its really "only" the code/php that we need to redo in
> ruby.

Wait until after RubyConf, I'll have a much better framework written by
then.

--=20
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://segment7.net
All messages signed with fingerprint:
FEC2 57F1 D465 EB15 5D6E  7C11 332A 551C 796C 9F04

In This Thread