From: Gavin Sinclair Date: 2003-09-09T07:55:31+09:00 Subject: Re: Reference documentation for Ruby 1.8.0 On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 2:42:16 AM, David wrote: > I've been using the RubyRef extraction from the PickAxe book while > working on Ruby 1.6.8, but I wonder how much of it is outdated now with > 1.8.0? In any case, it would be wonderful with a more up-to-date > version or a comparable alternative. Perhaps even something that could > be included with the Ruby distribution? > It's a shame that all those wonderful libraries that are now included > with Ruby isn't being served with any standard documentation. For > starters, couldn't the distribution just include all the individual > documentation packages that these libraries ship with on their own? > I remember reading about an effort to turn all the documentation from > the classic libraries into RDoc. How's that coming along? There are about 15 files done. All help appreciated. More details (on status) at http:///www.rubygarden.org/ruby?DocumentingTheStandardLibraries I'm considering creating a RubyForge project which distributes the HTML files generated from RDoc'ing the standard library. That would at least be a standard answer to the question "how's that project going" and also give people a chance to offer feedback - as well as giving them documentation. # Just got a few things to do first... Gavin