From: quixoticsycophant@... (Jeff Mitchell)
Date: 2003-09-05T03:06:32+09:00
Subject: Re: WEBrick and mod_ruby performance

Dmitry Borodaenko <d.borodaenko@sam-solutions.net> wrote in message news:<20030904144727.GB9114@sam-solutions.net>...
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:24:07AM +0900, ahoward wrote:
> > you should definitely check out fastcgi and the ruby fastcgi binding.  it's
> > AWESOMELY fast:
> > 
> >   ~ > ab http://eli/env.cgi | grep 'per second'
> >   Requests per second:    4.04 [#/sec] (mean)
> 
> What are you comparing it against: plain cgi, mod_ruby, or webrick?
> 
> >   ~ > ab http://eli/env.fcgi | grep 'per second'
> >   Requests per second:    557.10 [#/sec] (mean)

ahoward's post was unclear to me as well.

The performance of fastcgi would be essentially the same as
for mod_ruby, would it not?