From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2003-08-27T21:05:10+09:00
Subject: Re: Array#uniq!

Hi,

In message "Re: Array#uniq!"
    on 03/08/27, "Bill Kelly" <billk@cts.com> writes:

|> There are a number of "bang" methods that do this.  If I recall
|> correctly, matz has said they do this so that you CAN'T chain the
|> methods.
|
|I thought Matz had said it was because there'd be no equally
|efficient way to determine the did-anything-change test, otherwise.

You guys are right.  I've said both.

							matz.