From: Florian Frank <flori@...>
Date: 2003-08-27T02:38:20+09:00
Subject: Re: Array#uniq!

On 2003-08-27 02:00:55 +0900, Kurt M. Dresner wrote:
> That is a whole lot better than having to store a copy of the old array
> and then do set subtraction with the uniquified array.

This doesn't work: Array#uniq! just returns the now changed receiver.

-- 
Many companies that have made themselves dependent on IBM-equipment (and
in doing so have sold their soul to the devil) will collapse under the
sheer weight of the unmastered complexity of their data processing
systems.
  -- Edsger Dijkstra, How do we tell truths that might hurt?