From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2003-08-21T02:20:36+09:00
Subject: Re: the mindshare of Ruby (was)

Hi,

In message "Re: the mindshare of Ruby (was)"
    on 03/08/21, Ged Byrne <gedb01@yahoo.co.uk> writes:

|How is Ruby.net doing?  I can see Ruby being a much
|easier fit into the .Net runtime due to its
|fundamentally OO nature.

Unfortunately, .NET is not nice to the dynamic language camp.
So we will take bridge approach, a bridge between CLR and Ruby written
in C.

							matz.