From: Michael Garriss <mgarriss@...>
Date: 2003-08-12T09:16:57+09:00
Subject: Re: 1.8.0 vs. Windows XP problem

I've had the same problem a few times.  Today in fact! :)

Kurt M. Dresner wrote:

>When people pick a random email to reply to instead of typing the name
>of the list, it shows up as if it were a reply to that email (the
>In-Reply-To headers and References are all still there, even though he
>changed the subject line).  Thus, mutt can't thread it properly and
>everything gets out of wack.  :o(
>
>I just reread my mail and now it looks like I was trying to be mean, but
>I was just trying to ask politely that people not do that.  The internet
>always makes things look mean when it can though, doesn't it?
>
>-Kurt :o)  (wow, Emacs just matched the close parenthesis in that smiley
> with the open parenthesis in the previous smiley...)
>
>On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 02:36:48AM +0900, Hal E. Fulton wrote:
>  
>
>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>From: "Kurt M. Dresner" <kdresner@cs.utexas.edu>
>>To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
>>Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:47 AM
>>Subject: Re: 1.8.0 vs. Windows XP problem
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>>>"ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org"  See?  That wasn't too hard.  You could even
>>>set up an alias or something in your addressbook if that seems too
>>>daunting.
>>>
>>>*mumble mumble* Screwing up my threaded mail client *mumble mumble*
>>>      
>>>
>>Out of curiosity, what did he do to screw up your
>>mail client?
>>
>><jab type="good-natured>At least he's not a top-poster.</jab>
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Hal
>>
>>
>>======= End of Original Message =======<
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>