From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2003-08-11T17:40:43+09:00
Subject: Re: 1.8.0 change to super and nil block argument

Hi,

In message "1.8.0 change to super and nil block argument"
    on 03/08/11, Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@PATH.Berkeley.EDU> writes:
|A slight surprise:

You've found a bug.  Thanks.

							matz.

--- eval.c	7 Aug 2003 04:09:56 -0000	1.509
+++ eval.c	11 Aug 2003 08:40:25 -0000
@@ -1963,6 +1963,8 @@ copy_node_scope(node, rval)
     struct BLOCK *tmp_block = ruby_block;\
-    if (ruby_iter->iter == ITER_PRE) {\
+    int tmp_iter = ruby_iter->iter;\
+    if (tmp_iter == ITER_PRE) {\
 	ruby_block = ruby_block->outer;\
+        tmp_iter = ITER_NOT;\
     }\
-    PUSH_ITER(ITER_NOT)
+    PUSH_ITER(tmp_iter)
 
@@ -5241,3 +5243,3 @@ rb_call_super(argc, argv)
 
-    PUSH_ITER(ruby_iter->iter || rb_block_given_p() ? ITER_PRE : ITER_NOT);
+    PUSH_ITER(ruby_iter->iter ? ITER_PRE : ITER_NOT);
     result = rb_call(RCLASS(klass)->super, self, ruby_frame->orig_func, argc, argv, 3);