From: Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Date: 2003-08-11T12:14:44+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby docstrings

William Webber wrote:
  Best of all, the most exotic and inscrutable techniques
> for defining new methods, currently inscrutable to RDoc and likely
> always to remain so, would under this system still be capable of
> producing documentation.
> 
> Is there a reason why Ruby hasn't taken this approach?  Would it be a
> good approach to take?


But surely those method definitions would only be available if you 
actually executed the code? Wouldn't that be fairly dangerous?


Dave