From: Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>
Date: 2003-08-10T10:20:51+09:00
Subject: Re: Test::Unit in 1.8

Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
>>Second, you can no longer define a subclass of TestCase to be used as an 
>>"abstract" base class of other test case classes. For example, the 
>>following flunks, because BaseTest has no tests:
> 
> 
> [ruby-talk:76201] and the surrounding thread might be helpful.

Thanks for the tip, Nathaniel. (Gee, have I been out of touch, I didn't 
even think to scan the archive...)

Your suggestion to define an empty #default_test is better than what I 
had come up with.