From: Nathaniel Talbott Date: 2003-08-10T09:23:50+09:00 Subject: Re: Test::Unit in 1.8 Joel VanderWerf [mailto:vjoel@PATH.Berkeley.EDU] wrote: > First, you have to define #setup instead of #set_up. I guess I prefer > the new way (I remember a long discussion some time ago), but it might > be nice to get a warning that you have defined #set_up, and it will not > be called... Hmmm... a warning would be nice. Have to see about that. > Second, you can no longer define a subclass of TestCase to be used as an > "abstract" base class of other test case classes. For example, the > following flunks, because BaseTest has no tests: [ruby-talk:76201] and the surrounding thread might be helpful. Nathaniel <:((><