From: Brian Candler Date: 2003-08-10T04:11:24+09:00 Subject: Re: Ducktype, right? On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 03:21:27AM +0900, Hal E. Fulton wrote: > BTW, for people who actually care: If you're "thinking > in English" in these situations (bothered by the lack > of a "s"), you can always insert a "does" in front of > the interrogative: > > x.respond_to? y # Does x respond to y? > x.include? y # Does x include y? > > Just my $0.01, Nice thought, although it still doesn't read very well with "if" or "unless": if does x.respond_to? y .. end Maybe "if x does respond_to? y", or "if x can/will respond_to? y" Cheers, Brian.