From: Seth Kurtzberg <seth@...>
Date: 2003-08-01T07:35:45+09:00
Subject: Re: Spam at ruby-talk

You are correct about what I was suggesting.

However, I've written some scripts (in Ruby of course) that automate much of the training process.

On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 07:19:27 +0900
Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@math.umd.edu> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 07:13:26AM +0900, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> 
> > Bayesian and other probabilistic classifiers require training and would
> > be a poor choice to employ in an automated remailer.
> 
> I wasn't suggesting that we use Bayes in ruby-talk, just an upgrade of SA.  
> For that matter, I don't think Seth was suggesting that either.  I 
> interpreted his comment to refer to what I could do at my end.
> 
> I am using Bayes at my end at it helps a lot.
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Carrera | PGP: 6643 8C8B 3522 66CB D16C D779 2FDD 7DAC 9AF7 7A88
> Math PhD. UMD  | http://www.math.umd.edu/~dcarrera/pgp.html
> 
> * * * * *  Weekly Smile * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>   Sign in a hotel in Athens:
>   Visitors are expected to complain at the office between the hours
>   of 9 and 11 A.M. daily.
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Seth Kurtzberg
Research, Development, and Network Operations Center
ISEC.us
480-314-1540
seth@isec.us