From: Seth Kurtzberg Date: 2003-08-01T07:34:28+09:00 Subject: Re: Spam at ruby-talk I found the bayes filter in spamassassin to be largely ineffective. But I certainly have no objection to combinations. On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 06:46:18 +0900 Daniel Carrera wrote: > Thanks I'll keep that in mind. I'm using spamassassin because that's what > the sysadmin has installed. The latest version has a Bayes filter which > seems to help a lot. > > There's probably an advantage to using different programs for filtering > mail. Maybe one can pickup some kinds of spam that the other cannot. > > On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 04:26:24AM +0900, Seth Kurtzberg wrote: > > I've recently switched from spamassassin to spambayes with much improved results. > > > > -- > Daniel Carrera | PGP: 6643 8C8B 3522 66CB D16C D779 2FDD 7DAC 9AF7 7A88 > Math PhD. UMD | http://www.math.umd.edu/~dcarrera/pgp.html > > * * * * * Weekly Smile * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * > Sign in a hotel in Athens: > Visitors are expected to complain at the office between the hours > of 9 and 11 A.M. daily. > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * > > > -- Seth Kurtzberg Research, Development, and Network Operations Center ISEC.us 480-314-1540 seth@isec.us