From: gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com>
Date: 2003-07-30T11:28:01+09:00
Subject: Re: Warnings?

il Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:53:41 +0200, "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@gmx.net>
ha scritto::


>The approach most reasonable is IMHO to provide a warning handler setting
>mechanism similarly to the trace handler.  Only I don't know how much
>runtime overhead that'd be.  The handler block could receive something like
>|level, code, message, sender| and treat it appropriately.  -W0, -W1 etc.
>would then change the block's filtering according to level.


I proposed a think like this !
I'm not alone  ! :)
Oh, and a $VERBOSE as

$VERBOSE={ 'version_warnings'=>true,
           'uninitialized_vars'=>false,
           'redefined_nethode'=>true}

well, with more elements:)

>Or should we use a mature logging feature?  Maybe
>http://sourceforge.net/projects/log4r/ or a smaller solution.  Matz, what do
>you think?



devel/logger could fit?