From: Aredridel <aredridel@...>
Date: 2003-07-27T02:44:14+09:00
Subject: Re: Set doesn't have [] instance method

On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 11:39, Brian Candler wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 02:28:06AM +0900, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
> > It should, shouldn't it?  It's meant to combine the fast lookup of
> > Hash with the convenience of Array, yet the most important method Hash
> > and Array have in common, Set lacks!
> 
> What should it return - true/false? In which case it would just be an alias
> of 'include?' ? Personally I don't like having lots of aliases for the same
> method

It could return member or false -- 

s = Set.new(['a', 'b'])
s['a'] -> 'a'
s['c'] -> false

Ari