From: "Brett H. Williams" Date: 2003-07-25T09:02:28+09:00 Subject: Re: [OT] subversion, was [ANN] RubyForge.org On Jul 25, Brett H. Williams wrote: > On Jul 25, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > > When I asked my friend about this, he said there were several > > cases of problems when some user runs 'svnadmin recover' on > > a repository that people were still accessing. Is it possible > > that you would have run into that? (I don't even know what > > the "recover" would be used for...) > > Yes, these are the sorts of problems we continually encountered. But > until you do that no one can do anything with the repository, and you > must run svn admin on the machine that is hosting the repository (at > least in our experience). > > Basically, the current DB behind subversion is a Berkeley DB. > Apparently this DB gets corrupted. Hmm... upon a reread you are saying more than I first thought. Basically you are saying that if someone does svnadmin recover while someone else is attempting to access the repository, that we will have a worse failure than DB corruption? That may indeed have been what happened.