From: Gennady <gfb@...>
Date: 2003-07-25T06:06:58+09:00
Subject: Re: [OT] subversion, was [ANN] RubyForge.org


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Felker" <tcfelker@mtco.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] subversion, was [ANN] RubyForge.org


> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 07:52:54 +0900, Brett H. Williams wrote:
>
> > Both Perforce and BitKeeper are commercial.  They both have licensing
> > which allows them to be free for "free software/open source".  You'd
> > need to read the licensing for each for the details.
>
> You'd have to be very careful about the licensing.  For example, if you
> use BitKeeper, you may have signed away your ability to work on any
> competing project.  (See Stallman's recent troll in LKML, and Larry
McVoy's

Can you post links, please? If it is not too much of a burden, of course. I
am not a subscriber to LKML, but would be interested in reading it.

> replies.)  And SCM written in Ruby would be cool.  IANAL.
>
> -- 
> Tom Felker
>
> War not make one great.
>  -- Yoda
>
>
>