From: Simon Strandgaard <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@...>
Date: 2003-07-24T06:28:31+09:00
Subject: Re: [OT] subversion, was [ANN] RubyForge.org

On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 07:05:23 +0900, Bennett, Patrick wrote:
> Peter, I'd love to talk sbout this stuff offline if you want to continue
> Perforce/BitKeeper discussions.

Please keep it online.. I am following your discussion.

 
> Either way, I think Perforce or BitKeeper would be fine choices for
> RubyForge.  

Isn't BitKeeper pseudo commercial ?  Won't it affect license schemes for
ruby projects ?


--
Aunib Areabsfaaes