From: "Kurt M. Dresner" <kdresner@...>
Date: 2003-07-24T02:43:22+09:00
Subject: Re: New RDoc template, and a question

I would have to agree with the people that say the source is hard to
read with those colors.  Additionally. I liked the way that more
files/classes/methods fit in those top windows before.  And I'd really
like the option to view one of the files.  If I see blahblah.rb I might
just want to look at the whole thing instead of having to click on every
function in the file.

Other than that, I like it a lot :o)

-Kurt

On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 11:45:08PM +0900, james_b wrote:
> Dave Thomas wrote:
> >
> >Now the question: this new template relies on DHTML, Javascript, and a 
> >lot of CSS. Has the world of browsers advanced to the point where I 
> >could make this the default style, or do we still need to support the 
> >previous generation?
> 
> The behavior is fine in IE 6 and Mozilla 1.3.1.
> All links have an odd purple glow; I'm guessing, though, that this is 
> intentional.  Not sure how this helps usability.
> 
> The black background for the source code, though, makes the text hard to 
> read.
> 
> If the use of scripting and CSS is acceptable across a sufficient number 
> of browsers, perhaps a CSS switcher script (sucah as described at [0]) 
> should be included as a well, with a reasonable slection of style sheets 
> (big fonts, or plain colors, or whatever).
> 
> James	
> 
> 
> [0] http://www.alistapart.com/stories/alternate/
> 
> >
> >
> >Cheers
> >
> >
> >Dave
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
>======= End of Original Message =======<