From: "Mauricio Fernández" <batsman.geo@...>
Date: 2003-07-22T05:38:03+09:00
Subject: Re: matz thoughts on Rite ?

On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 05:26:16AM +0900, Simon Strandgaard wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 04:20:03 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> > 
> > For this time only. ;-)
> [snip Q&A]
> 
> A few more questions:
> 
> What is you thoughts about Ruby-to-bytecode, eg: jruby, netruby, parrot?

He said before it'd be bytecode, too lazy to lookup the references but
they're easy to find.

> Is this the way to go for ruby ?
> 
> Making Rite faster than Ruby, how ?  jit?  gc?  other?

bytecode + generational GC to begin with

> Is 'Rite' just a codename.. Or should the 'Ruby' name be abandoned?

Rite is the name of the implementation. The name of the language doesn't change.

-- 
 _           _                             
| |__   __ _| |_ ___ _ __ ___   __ _ _ __  
| '_ \ / _` | __/ __| '_ ` _ \ / _` | '_ \ 
| |_) | (_| | |_\__ \ | | | | | (_| | | | |
|_.__/ \__,_|\__|___/_| |_| |_|\__,_|_| |_|
	Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable)
batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com

<rm_-rf_> The real value of KDE is that they inspired and push the
          development of GNOME :-)
	-- #Debian