From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) Date: 2003-07-19T10:59:10+09:00 Subject: Re: what happened to Block class? Hi, In message "Re: what happened to Block class?" on 03/07/19, nobu.nokada@softhome.net writes: |> Can you elaborate on the reason for doing it that way, instead of a |> different class? The Block class seemed much cleaner to me. | |According to Matz diary (http://www.rubyist.net/~matz/?date=20030616#p05), |apparently, because they are too similar. If you want better explanation, ask Dave Thomas. I explained this issue to him face to face at the OSCON last week about for half hour. I believe he understood both the behavior and the reason. matz.