From: "Mauricio Fernández" <batsman.geo@...>
Date: 2003-07-18T04:17:03+09:00
Subject: Re: Keyword "with"

On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 02:59:00AM +0900, Anders Borch wrote:
> I was merely showing a proof of concept (implementing pre-increment 
> since that was the easy one), but if you like, I shall implement both 
> pre- and postincrement. I saw the flaw you pointed out shortly after 
> posting, but saw no need to complicate my implementation unless someone 
> actually made the explicit distinction between the two forms of 
> incrementation.

Is there any better way than
 ++x => (begin x = x.succ; x end)
?

IIRC C doesn't guarantee any evaluation order, so
  a = x++ - x++
is undefined (can be -1, 0 or 1 depending on how things are done).

-- 
 _           _                             
| |__   __ _| |_ ___ _ __ ___   __ _ _ __  
| '_ \ / _` | __/ __| '_ ` _ \ / _` | '_ \ 
| |_) | (_| | |_\__ \ | | | | | (_| | | | |
|_.__/ \__,_|\__|___/_| |_| |_|\__,_|_| |_|
	Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable)
batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com

<joost> Do you mean to say that I can read mail with vi too? ;-)
<Joey> Didn't you know that?
<Joey> :r /var/spool/mail/jk
	-- debian-mentors