From: Nathaniel Talbott Date: 2003-07-17T08:30:35+09:00 Subject: Re: Test::Unit no tests specified Gennady [mailto:gfb@tonesoft.com] wrote: > If you define emptiness as not asserting anything in the > method, you could do above mentioned by resetting a flag > (TestCase instance variable) before calling a test method and > check it after the method returns. Asserts would set this > flag and if the flag is not set it would mean that no assert > had been called. True, but I don't think that's a good definition of empty test. As Brian said, I might only conditionally assert, or I might simply have a #flunk in a test (which won't get called if the test succeeds). Nathaniel <:((><