From: Gennady <gfb@...>
Date: 2003-07-12T04:57:38+09:00
Subject: Re: cross-corr time/array lag problem

And you sacrificed this nice Ruby feature for ... what do you call it? Perl?
;-)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Florian Frank" <flori@nixe.ping.de>
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: cross-corr time/array lag problem


> On 2003-07-12 04:16:41 +0900, Gennady wrote:
> > Or just
> >
> > b = a[1..-1]
>
> Yes. But I don't do that any more, because I started to use it in Perl's
> array slices where this doesn't work. In Perl just an empty array is
> returned. It took me a while before I found that bug! :-/
>
> -- 
> For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and
> wrong.
>   -- H. L. Mencken
>
>