From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2003-07-11T15:50:31+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby's license

Hi,

In message "Ruby's license"
    on 03/07/11, "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@hypermetrics.com> writes:

|Does this license actually have a name? Is there any
|reason we shouldn't call it the Ruby License?

I didn't name it. But you're free to call it Ruby License as long as
it doesn't confuse anybody.  Note that the license includes the line:

  Ruby is copyrighted free software by Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.jp>.
  You can redistribute it and/or modify it under either the terms of the GPL
  (see the file GPL), or the conditions below:

So naturally, the license is always dual between GPL and terms in the COPYING.

							matz.