From: Robert Klemme <bob.news@...>
Date: 2003-07-04T23:16:52+09:00
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Using & for arrays of objects


LLLL         OOOOO   LLLL
LLLL        OOOOOOO   LLLL
LLLL       OOO   OOO   LLLL
LLLL       OOO   OOO   LLLL
LLLL       OOO   OOO   LLLL
LLLL       OOO   OOO   LLLL
LLLL       OOO   OOO   LLLL
LLLLLLLLLLL    OOOOOOO   LLLLLLLLLLL
LLLLLLLLLLL     OOOOO   LLLLLLLLLLL

"Mauricio Fern�ndez" <batsman.geo@yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:20030704091432.GC9681@student.ei.uni-stuttgart.de...
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 04:54:38PM +0900, Robert Klemme wrote:
> > > Which Ruby doesn't support: an object cannot be created without
using
> > > a constructor.
> >
> > No OO language that I know does (maybe JavaScript), but you can have
> > factories nevertheless.  And you might hide the constructor from the
> > public somewhere deep in the womb of the factory.
> >
> > > So how is the "first" object created?
>
> I guess the statement "it is normal for somebody your age to be curious
> about these things, but..." is a clich� :-))
>
> > I guess you'll find out quite easily by looking into Ruby source code.
:-)
>
> Beware: you could be talking to a minor. Some say that such immoral
> material (C code) should be kept away from the impressionable minds of
> The Children (tm).
>
> -- 
>  _           _
> | |__   __ _| |_ ___ _ __ ___   __ _ _ __
> | '_ \ / _` | __/ __| '_ ` _ \ / _` | '_ \
> | |_) | (_| | |_\__ \ | | | | | (_| | | | |
> |_.__/ \__,_|\__|___/_| |_| |_|\__,_|_| |_|
> Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable)
> batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com
>
> How should I know if it works?  That's what beta testers are for.  I
> only coded it.
> -- Attributed to Linus Torvalds, somewhere in a posting
>