From: Rudolf Polzer Date: 2003-07-04T06:52:19+09:00 Subject: Re: Using & for arrays of objects Scripsit ille �Robert Klemme� : > "Rudolf Polzer" schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:slrnbg69ll.99k.denshimeiru-sapmctacher@message-id.durchnull.ath.cx... > > > class Human < Beer > > Hm, I find this modeling a tad bit unrealistic. Beer = Be-er = someone who is ^_^ Didn't you read the (misplaced) comment? > > i = Human.new() > > In fact we both made an error here: you need a factory and a helper class > (both sub classes of Human) to create a new Human. Which Ruby doesn't support: an object cannot be created without using a constructor. So how is the "first" object created? -- Du fingst mit Einem heimlich an, Bald kommen ihrer mehre dran, Und wenn dich erst ein Dutzend hat, So hat dich auch die ganze Stadt.