From: Simon Strandgaard <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@...>
Date: 2003-06-28T07:15:01+09:00
Subject: Re: Using & for arrays of objects

On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:20:49 +0000, Jason Creighton wrote:

> On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 20:04:13 +0200
> "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Many of my postings cause more confusion than understanding :-)
>> 
>> I did especialy a terrible job, when I suggested the RCR  
>> if Array#join should take a block. If I had better english
>> skills then I would redo this RCR.  I feel guilty!
>> http://www.rubygarden.org/article.php?sid=301
> 
> Hey, don't feel bad. I think you did a good job of explaining why you want
> #join to accept a block. (I still think it's a bad idea, for reasons given in
> the comments of that RCR.)

I only feel bad about my english skills. Otherwise I feel good :-)
I think Ruby+'test-first' has a made me a much more happy person.


> With English being my first (Actually, my only) language, I still managed to
> sumbit my RCR (http://rubygarden.org/article.php?sid=305) without realizing
> that you could do what I wanted with RUBYOPT. How could I possibly be so
> dense? (Don't answer that! :-) )

Agree, It happens for me all the time.. waking up next morning just to
realize that I did a lame posting just before I went to sleep.

--
Simon Strandgaard