From: Phlip Date: 2003-06-23T01:49:35+09:00 Subject: Re: Exasperated with ruby/tk - anybody successfully using it? Richard Browne wrote: > General question: Is ruby/tk still being maintained in 1.7/1.8 or is it > dead? There is no documentation that I can find, and almost everything I try > results in a ruby error/bug. For example: > > - Attempt to use TkSpinbox result in 'tk_call': invalid command name > `spinbox' > > - Attempt to use TkOptionMenubutton results in `__invoke': unknown option > "-kind_of" > > - The event with TkOptionMenubutton does not work properly > > - Attempt to use the -command option with TkOptionMenubutton results in > `__invoke': unknown option "-command" > > - I upgraded to ruby180-9 from http://rubyinstaller.sourceforge.net/, and > after doing so the Tk.mainloop call never even returns!! Hidetoshi Nagai may be unfamiliar with Ruby on Win32. That installer comes with both Ruby/Tk and the raw binary Tk underneath it. So if it can't do these simple things, complain to the installer's mailing lists. > Is anybody using ruby/tk successfully? I'm making an excellent example of it. Especially the TkCanvas. It's better than other wrappers on the TCL/TK Canvas. -- Phlip http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?TestFirstUserInterfaces