From: Guillaume Marcais <guslist@...>
Date: 2003-06-19T06:59:22+09:00
Subject: Re: syck/yaml fail unit test

I used neither so I can safely ignore the failures. Correct?

Thank you,
Guillaume.

On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 17:25, why the lucky stiff wrote:
> Known issues.  Both are encoding issues (UTF-32 and hex escapes in URIs).  
> Small issues that should be resolved soon.
> 
> _why
> 
> On Wednesday 18 June 2003 03:11 pm, Guillaume Marcais wrote:
> > I get 2 failures with the unit tests within syck (0.35, from tarball).
> > Known issues? Should I use CVS version?
> 
>