From: "Mauricio Fernández" <batsman.geo@...>
Date: 2003-06-18T19:17:55+09:00
Subject: Re: re-open a class --> re-open a method?

On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 06:32:59PM +0900, you CAN teach an old dog ... wrote:
> In exactly the same spirit, wouldn't it make sense to allow some kind
> of re-open of a method, rather than only the current :alias mechanism
> (which is itself wonderful after some other languages)? The accessible
> 'internal' points could include method-entry, method return, method
> exception exit. Through these accessible points we could incrementally
> and modularly define a method (or, perhaps more importantly, some
> cross-cutting aspect of a bunch of methods across a bunch of classes).
> 
> Thoughts?

matz is already thinking on that :-)

Take a look at 

http://www.rubyist.net/~matz/?date=20030513#p04
[73196]
[73230]


-- 
 _           _                             
| |__   __ _| |_ ___ _ __ ___   __ _ _ __  
| '_ \ / _` | __/ __| '_ ` _ \ / _` | '_ \ 
| |_) | (_| | |_\__ \ | | | | | (_| | | | |
|_.__/ \__,_|\__|___/_| |_| |_|\__,_|_| |_|
	Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable)
batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com

<lilo> Fairlight: udp is the light margarine of tcp/ip transport protocols :)
	-- Seen on #Linux