From: theschof@... (Alexander Schofield)
Date: 2003-06-17T06:57:41+09:00
Subject: Re: multiple blocks or proc arguments to method

ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote in message news:<200306161025.h5GAPBB07480@moulon.inra.fr>...
> >>>>> "A" == Alexander Schofield <theschof@cs.com> writes:
> 
> A> What version are you using?  I get:
> 
>  1.8
> 
> A> Was there a change in 1.7 or 1.8 with this behavior?  What would the
> A> behavior be if "a" had used an instance variable that had been aliased
> A> to something else in B, or a private instance variable of A?
> 
>  I don't know what is a "private instance variable".

Sorry I meant accessor method.  Specifically, if the instance method
of A used an accessor method (defined in A that was private), bound to
an instance of B would it work?  And would the bound instance method
have polymorphic behavior-- if for example I redefined the accessor
method in B which would bound method use (and would scope make any
difference with this)?