From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2003-03-31T11:15:06+09:00
Subject: Re: inspect question/request

Hi,

In message "inspect question/request"
    on 03/03/31, "Chris Pine" <nemo@hellotree.com> writes:

|When Ruby stumbles upon an object with a missing method, it says something
|like this:
|
|  undefined method `foo' for #<Object:0x28091a0>
|
|However, that is *not* what inspect returns for that object.  It would be
|really helpful to me if I could tell Ruby to call inspect like it normally
|does, rather than just telling me what class it's in.

Yeah, right.  It's been like that from the beginning, but I don't
remember why I did so.  OK, I will change to use "inspect" and see how
it work.

							matz.