From: Julian Snitow <vangczung@...>
Date: 2003-03-28T15:16:18+09:00
Subject: Re: [Q]  Caveats of rb_global_variable() ?

ts wrote:
>>>>>>"t" == ts  <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
> 
> 
>  Bad, bad
> 
> 
> t>  Well, it's really difficult to answer without seeing your C source but
> t>  rb_global_variable() use rb_gc_register_variable() and the opposite is
>                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>                              rb_gc_register_address()
> t>  rb_gc_unregister_variable() 
>     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>     rb_gc_unregister_address()
> 
> 
> Guy Decoux

Thanks.  Can rb_gc_unregister_adddress() be safely called on an address 
that wasn't necessarily registered in the first place?  If so, I can 
solve my problem neatly.

(If not, I get to go source diving again.... ;-)