From: "Mauricio Fernández" <batsman.geo@...>
Date: 2003-03-26T19:03:05+09:00
Subject: Re: question about include and modules

On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 06:54:58PM +0900, ts wrote:
> >>>>> "M" == Mauricio =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez?= <Mauricio> writes:
> 
> M> Is this because array.c uses rb_include_module instead of
> M> rb_mod_include?
>
 [great explanation]  
> 
>  If you include another module in B, ruby will not update the path for A
>  (it has lost the information that B was included in A)

Is this just an implementation issue that will be solved eventually (in
Rite?) or are the current semantics going to stay fixed?

-- 
 _           _                             
| |__   __ _| |_ ___ _ __ ___   __ _ _ __  
| '_ \ / _` | __/ __| '_ ` _ \ / _` | '_ \ 
| |_) | (_| | |_\__ \ | | | | | (_| | | | |
|_.__/ \__,_|\__|___/_| |_| |_|\__,_|_| |_|
	Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable)
batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com

Linux: Where Don't We Want To Go Today?
	-- Submitted by Pancrazio De Mauro, paraphrasing some well-known sales talk