From: Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Date: 2003-03-25T18:13:18+09:00
Subject: Re: Expression results

On Sunday, March 23, 2003, 10:50:50 AM, Rudolf wrote:

> | 31: The Arbitrary Prime --
> |         Determined by unanimous unvote.  We needed an arbitrary prime in
> |         case the prof asked for one, and so had an election.  91 received
> |         the most votes (well, it *looks* prime) and 3+4i the next most.
> |         However, 31 was the only candidate to receive none at all.

> Try to find all mistakes. I see two nonobvious mistakes in there...

> BTW: 91 is the second composite number which looks prime. 1 is the first
> one, of course.


I don't know what you actually call 1, but it's not composite (doesn't
have prime factors).

What are the nonobvious mistakes in there?

Gavin